The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Provenance and geochemistry of sedimentary components in the Volcano-Sedimentary Complex, Iberian Pyrite Belt: discrimination between the sill-sediment complex and volcanic-pile models

Provenance and geochemistry of sedimentary components in the Volcano-Sedimentary Complex, Iberian Pyrite Belt: discrimination between the sill-sediment complex and volcanic-pile models
Provenance and geochemistry of sedimentary components in the Volcano-Sedimentary Complex, Iberian Pyrite Belt: discrimination between the sill-sediment complex and volcanic-pile models
Two highly contrasting models have been proposed for the palaeovolcanological setting of the massive sulphide deposits in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. The long-standing view of the host rocks is that they are a pile of effusive and pyroclastic rocks but this position has now been challenged by the proposal that high-level peperitic sills predominate. Discrimination between the volcanic-pile and sill–sediment-complex models is important because they lead to very different conclusions about such key metallogenic features as the timing of mineralization, the nature of the ore-forming convective system and the source of the metals. Sedimentary geochemistry, particularly REE and Ti/Nb, shows that there is no correspondence between the chemistries of mafic igneous sheets and intercalated stratified-volcaniclastic rocks that range from andesite to rhyodacite in composition. Therefore none of the mafic sheets supplied detritus to the sedimentary environment. Sedimentary rocks of continental provenance persist throughout the host-rock sequence, especially in mineralized regions, implying confinement of the majority of primary volcanic facies in the form of high-level intrusions. Some andesitic and felsic intrusions created a minor, stratified volcaniclastic component via hydrovolcanic eruptions. The volcanic-pile model is invalidated because the expected provenance patterns for this volcanic style are not present and the sill–sediment-complex setting of the sulphide deposits is confirmed
0016-7649
103-115
Boulter, C.A.
4d1207e1-8254-49d2-87d1-359588f9a493
Hopkinson, L.J.
4e50d1bc-62c2-47e4-a354-c2185d13908c
Ineson, M.G.
baab5ef7-8679-48e6-9fbe-a83cfe9937c2
Brockwell, J.S.
1026df01-1e49-4b7e-966e-8f7b5f319763
Boulter, C.A.
4d1207e1-8254-49d2-87d1-359588f9a493
Hopkinson, L.J.
4e50d1bc-62c2-47e4-a354-c2185d13908c
Ineson, M.G.
baab5ef7-8679-48e6-9fbe-a83cfe9937c2
Brockwell, J.S.
1026df01-1e49-4b7e-966e-8f7b5f319763

Boulter, C.A., Hopkinson, L.J., Ineson, M.G. and Brockwell, J.S. (2004) Provenance and geochemistry of sedimentary components in the Volcano-Sedimentary Complex, Iberian Pyrite Belt: discrimination between the sill-sediment complex and volcanic-pile models. Journal of the Geological Society, 161 (1), 103-115.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Two highly contrasting models have been proposed for the palaeovolcanological setting of the massive sulphide deposits in the Iberian Pyrite Belt. The long-standing view of the host rocks is that they are a pile of effusive and pyroclastic rocks but this position has now been challenged by the proposal that high-level peperitic sills predominate. Discrimination between the volcanic-pile and sill–sediment-complex models is important because they lead to very different conclusions about such key metallogenic features as the timing of mineralization, the nature of the ore-forming convective system and the source of the metals. Sedimentary geochemistry, particularly REE and Ti/Nb, shows that there is no correspondence between the chemistries of mafic igneous sheets and intercalated stratified-volcaniclastic rocks that range from andesite to rhyodacite in composition. Therefore none of the mafic sheets supplied detritus to the sedimentary environment. Sedimentary rocks of continental provenance persist throughout the host-rock sequence, especially in mineralized regions, implying confinement of the majority of primary volcanic facies in the form of high-level intrusions. Some andesitic and felsic intrusions created a minor, stratified volcaniclastic component via hydrovolcanic eruptions. The volcanic-pile model is invalidated because the expected provenance patterns for this volcanic style are not present and the sill–sediment-complex setting of the sulphide deposits is confirmed

Text
103.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 13495
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/13495
ISSN: 0016-7649
PURE UUID: b5e86c98-6c2d-43fe-8620-a64792aa457f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Dec 2004
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: C.A. Boulter
Author: L.J. Hopkinson
Author: M.G. Ineson
Author: J.S. Brockwell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×