The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of ligands with their preferred binding sites

The effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of ligands with their preferred binding sites
The effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of ligands with their preferred binding sites
We have examined the effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of distamycin, Hoechst 33258, echinomycin, actinomycin and mithramycin with their preferred binding sites using a series of DNA fragments that contain every symmetrical hexanucleotide sequence. In several instances we find that the affinity for the ligands' preferred binding sites is affected by the hexanucleotide context in which they are located.

The AT-selective minor groove binding ligand Hoechst 33258 shows a 200-fold difference in binding to the 16 different X(A/T)4Y sites; the strongest binding is to AAATTT and the weakest is to (G/C)TTAA(C/G). Although TTAA is generally a poor binding site, ATTAAT is better than TTTAAA and they are both much better than GTTAAC and CTTAAG. Similarly, TTATAA and ATATAT are better binding sites than GTATAC and CTATAG.

In contrast, distamycin shows less discrimination between the various X(A/T)4Y sites, with a 20-fold difference between the best [(A/T)AATT(T/A)] and worst [GATATC and (G/C)TTAA(C/G)] sites. Although actinomycin binds to GpC it shows little or no interaction with any of the GGCC sites, yet shows only a six-fold variation in affinities for the other XYGCXY sites. Echinomycin binds to CpG yet shows no binding to TTCGAA, TGCGCA and AGCGCT, while the best binding is to AACGTT.

The tetranucleotides CCGG and ACGT produce consistently good binding sites, irrespective of the surrounding sequences, while the interaction with TCGA and GCGC is sensitive to the hexanucleotide context. Hexanucleotides with a central GCGC, flanked by A and T are weaker echinomycin sites than those flanked by G and C, especially CGCGCG.

The best X(G/C)4Y binding sites for mithramycin were located at AGCGCT and GGGCCC, and the worst at CCCGGG and TCCGGA. These footprinting fragments are valuable tools for comparing the binding of ligands to all the potential symmetrical hexanucleotides and provide insights into the effects of local DNA sequence on ligand-DNA interactions.

DNA recognition, footprinting, mithramycin, echinomycin, actinomycin, distamycin, hoechst 33258
0300-9084
988-998
Hampshire, Andrew J.
68aac3b7-88b7-4417-8793-9c2a06b01abc
Fox, Keith R.
9da5debc-4e45-473e-ab8c-550d1104659f
Hampshire, Andrew J.
68aac3b7-88b7-4417-8793-9c2a06b01abc
Fox, Keith R.
9da5debc-4e45-473e-ab8c-550d1104659f

Hampshire, Andrew J. and Fox, Keith R. (2008) The effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of ligands with their preferred binding sites. Biochimie, 90 (7), supplement Targeting DNA Part 1, 988-998. (doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2008.01.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We have examined the effects of local DNA sequence on the interaction of distamycin, Hoechst 33258, echinomycin, actinomycin and mithramycin with their preferred binding sites using a series of DNA fragments that contain every symmetrical hexanucleotide sequence. In several instances we find that the affinity for the ligands' preferred binding sites is affected by the hexanucleotide context in which they are located.

The AT-selective minor groove binding ligand Hoechst 33258 shows a 200-fold difference in binding to the 16 different X(A/T)4Y sites; the strongest binding is to AAATTT and the weakest is to (G/C)TTAA(C/G). Although TTAA is generally a poor binding site, ATTAAT is better than TTTAAA and they are both much better than GTTAAC and CTTAAG. Similarly, TTATAA and ATATAT are better binding sites than GTATAC and CTATAG.

In contrast, distamycin shows less discrimination between the various X(A/T)4Y sites, with a 20-fold difference between the best [(A/T)AATT(T/A)] and worst [GATATC and (G/C)TTAA(C/G)] sites. Although actinomycin binds to GpC it shows little or no interaction with any of the GGCC sites, yet shows only a six-fold variation in affinities for the other XYGCXY sites. Echinomycin binds to CpG yet shows no binding to TTCGAA, TGCGCA and AGCGCT, while the best binding is to AACGTT.

The tetranucleotides CCGG and ACGT produce consistently good binding sites, irrespective of the surrounding sequences, while the interaction with TCGA and GCGC is sensitive to the hexanucleotide context. Hexanucleotides with a central GCGC, flanked by A and T are weaker echinomycin sites than those flanked by G and C, especially CGCGCG.

The best X(G/C)4Y binding sites for mithramycin were located at AGCGCT and GGGCCC, and the worst at CCCGGG and TCCGGA. These footprinting fragments are valuable tools for comparing the binding of ligands to all the potential symmetrical hexanucleotides and provide insights into the effects of local DNA sequence on ligand-DNA interactions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2008
Keywords: DNA recognition, footprinting, mithramycin, echinomycin, actinomycin, distamycin, hoechst 33258

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 142579
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/142579
ISSN: 0300-9084
PURE UUID: 1640d5a0-676a-42d1-b1f3-4e1951c8f146
ORCID for Keith R. Fox: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-7315

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Apr 2010 15:39
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Andrew J. Hampshire
Author: Keith R. Fox ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×