The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Are children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes different in terms of aspects of everyday attention?

Are children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes different in terms of aspects of everyday attention?
Are children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes different in terms of aspects of everyday attention?
The validity of the DSM-IV subtypes is a recurring diagnostic debate in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Laboratory measures, such as the test of everyday attention for children (TEA-Ch) can help us address this question. TEA-Ch is a test battery covering different aspects of everyday attention relating to selective and sustained attention and attentional control. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether this instrument can differentiate between combined (ADHD-C) and inattentive subtype (ADHD-I) of ADHD. Subjects were recruited from a multidisciplinary ADHD outpatient unit and tested free of medication. Sixty-four children with a diagnosis of ADHD were included (38 with ADHD-C; 26 with ADHD-I). The control group was 76 children recruited from primary and secondary schools. Children with ADHD performed worse than controls on 6 out of 9 TEA-Ch subtests. However a regression analysis revealed that TEA-Ch subtests made only a marginal contribution to the correct classification of ADHD, once the effects of IQ and age are controlled. Confirmatory factor analysis in our ADHD group demonstrated that the three factor structure achieved a poor fit. More detailed analysis suggested that inferior performance on the tasks designed to test vigilance was not the result of deficient-sustained attention. ADHD-C and ADHD-I showed very few differences across tasks. In conclusion, our results provided not much support for the value of the ADHD-C and ADHD-I distinction in predicting difficulties in everyday attention.

attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, subtypes, test of everyday attention for children
1018-8827
679 - 685
Lemiere, Jurgen
b889059c-b463-48ef-8fc7-04169b15be5c
Wouters, Heidi
779a517f-a89c-4390-9937-f43dcd4ebdab
Sterken, Caroline
6d5cab75-d028-4e73-9d8e-b3e3961f7cc5
Lagae, Lieven
e419ad97-bb19-4af3-abad-942aa6b76166
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635
Danckaerts, Marina
e7e7618b-6dd0-4520-bf4e-865597928758
Lemiere, Jurgen
b889059c-b463-48ef-8fc7-04169b15be5c
Wouters, Heidi
779a517f-a89c-4390-9937-f43dcd4ebdab
Sterken, Caroline
6d5cab75-d028-4e73-9d8e-b3e3961f7cc5
Lagae, Lieven
e419ad97-bb19-4af3-abad-942aa6b76166
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
bc80bf95-6cf9-4c76-a09d-eaaf0b717635
Danckaerts, Marina
e7e7618b-6dd0-4520-bf4e-865597928758

Lemiere, Jurgen, Wouters, Heidi, Sterken, Caroline, Lagae, Lieven, Sonuga-Barke, Edmund and Danckaerts, Marina (2010) Are children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined subtypes different in terms of aspects of everyday attention? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 19 (8), 679 - 685. (doi:10.1007/s00787-010-0105-9).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The validity of the DSM-IV subtypes is a recurring diagnostic debate in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Laboratory measures, such as the test of everyday attention for children (TEA-Ch) can help us address this question. TEA-Ch is a test battery covering different aspects of everyday attention relating to selective and sustained attention and attentional control. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether this instrument can differentiate between combined (ADHD-C) and inattentive subtype (ADHD-I) of ADHD. Subjects were recruited from a multidisciplinary ADHD outpatient unit and tested free of medication. Sixty-four children with a diagnosis of ADHD were included (38 with ADHD-C; 26 with ADHD-I). The control group was 76 children recruited from primary and secondary schools. Children with ADHD performed worse than controls on 6 out of 9 TEA-Ch subtests. However a regression analysis revealed that TEA-Ch subtests made only a marginal contribution to the correct classification of ADHD, once the effects of IQ and age are controlled. Confirmatory factor analysis in our ADHD group demonstrated that the three factor structure achieved a poor fit. More detailed analysis suggested that inferior performance on the tasks designed to test vigilance was not the result of deficient-sustained attention. ADHD-C and ADHD-I showed very few differences across tasks. In conclusion, our results provided not much support for the value of the ADHD-C and ADHD-I distinction in predicting difficulties in everyday attention.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2 April 2010
Keywords: attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, subtypes, test of everyday attention for children

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 143505
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/143505
ISSN: 1018-8827
PURE UUID: ea6c814b-e93a-4aed-a24c-5aa5609970e6

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Apr 2010 09:01
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jurgen Lemiere
Author: Heidi Wouters
Author: Caroline Sterken
Author: Lieven Lagae
Author: Edmund Sonuga-Barke
Author: Marina Danckaerts

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×