The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in young people: reflections from the families’ perspective

Cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in young people: reflections from the families’ perspective
Cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in young people: reflections from the families’ perspective
Objectives:

Recent trials have produced optimistic results for family-focussed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in young people. This study sought to examine the under-researched question of the views and experiences of patients and families who take part.

Design:

Semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis were chosen in order to address clients' perspectives in depth.

Methods:

Sixteen young people and sixteen parents who participated in a trial of CBT versus psycho-education (PE) for CFS were interviewed. Key themes were discerned using inductive thematic analysis.

Results:

Most families had low expectations of a cure but hope for improvement. Generally speaking, participants found both CBT and PE acceptable and helpful. Behavioural aspects of CBT (e.g. goal-setting, graded activity) were found helpful. The opportunity to gain support, recognition and validation was important. Cognitive elements of therapy were sometimes deemed inappropriate and some felt emotional aspects of CFS were not adequately addressed. Participants were ambivalent towards the extent of family involvement. Negative experiences related to the therapy setting and feeling inappropriately labeled. Most participants felt therapy was a stepping-stone towards normal life, although many felt recovery was incomplete. Very few differences were found between themes from CBT and PE participants. A notable exception was that every young person who experienced CBT described therapy as helpful, whereas the participants who strongly opposed the therapy approach had all experienced PE.

Conclusions:

The detailed insights regarding families' therapy experiences suggest areas of improvement for service delivery and topics for further investigation.
1359-107X
167-183(17)
Dennison, Laura
15c399cb-9a81-4948-8906-21944c033c20
Stanbrook, Rachel
b53e8268-547a-496e-9d94-f6d1d4ca1c86
Moss-Morris, Rona
a502f58a-d319-49a6-8aea-9dde4efc871e
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Chalder, Trudie
cb09653b-2c1e-4dfc-bb13-c6e8ca918602
Dennison, Laura
15c399cb-9a81-4948-8906-21944c033c20
Stanbrook, Rachel
b53e8268-547a-496e-9d94-f6d1d4ca1c86
Moss-Morris, Rona
a502f58a-d319-49a6-8aea-9dde4efc871e
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Chalder, Trudie
cb09653b-2c1e-4dfc-bb13-c6e8ca918602

Dennison, Laura, Stanbrook, Rachel, Moss-Morris, Rona, Yardley, Lucy and Chalder, Trudie (2010) Cognitive behavioural therapy and psycho-education for chronic fatigue syndrome in young people: reflections from the families’ perspective. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15 (1), 167-183(17). (doi:10.1348/135910709X440034).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives:

Recent trials have produced optimistic results for family-focussed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in young people. This study sought to examine the under-researched question of the views and experiences of patients and families who take part.

Design:

Semi-structured interviews and qualitative analysis were chosen in order to address clients' perspectives in depth.

Methods:

Sixteen young people and sixteen parents who participated in a trial of CBT versus psycho-education (PE) for CFS were interviewed. Key themes were discerned using inductive thematic analysis.

Results:

Most families had low expectations of a cure but hope for improvement. Generally speaking, participants found both CBT and PE acceptable and helpful. Behavioural aspects of CBT (e.g. goal-setting, graded activity) were found helpful. The opportunity to gain support, recognition and validation was important. Cognitive elements of therapy were sometimes deemed inappropriate and some felt emotional aspects of CFS were not adequately addressed. Participants were ambivalent towards the extent of family involvement. Negative experiences related to the therapy setting and feeling inappropriately labeled. Most participants felt therapy was a stepping-stone towards normal life, although many felt recovery was incomplete. Very few differences were found between themes from CBT and PE participants. A notable exception was that every young person who experienced CBT described therapy as helpful, whereas the participants who strongly opposed the therapy approach had all experienced PE.

Conclusions:

The detailed insights regarding families' therapy experiences suggest areas of improvement for service delivery and topics for further investigation.

Text
Dennison_et_al_CFS_qual_study_BJHP_2010.doc - Accepted Manuscript
Download (180kB)

More information

Published date: February 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 146013
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146013
ISSN: 1359-107X
PURE UUID: 4bb23831-bff9-43e8-a370-78a54b231413
ORCID for Laura Dennison: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-6610
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Apr 2010 11:25
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laura Dennison ORCID iD
Author: Rachel Stanbrook
Author: Rona Moss-Morris
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD
Author: Trudie Chalder

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×