Police shootings and the role of tort
Steele, Jenny and Palmer, Philip (2008) Police shootings and the role of tort. Modern Law Review , 71, (5), 801-811. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00716.x).
Download
|
PDF (case study)
- Publishers print
Download (129Kb) |
Description/Abstract
In Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex, the House of Lords ruled that a civil claim in trespass to the person may be sustained against an individual police officer in respect of a fatal shooting, in circumstances where the officer had already been acquitted in criminal proceedings and where liability to compensate in respect of all losses had been conceded.
Two members of the majority clearly ruled that trespass torts may have a vindicatory purpose which survives a concession of liability to compensate, thus deepening the connection between tort, and the protection of fundamental rights, and suggesting an intriguing distinction between the functions of civil and criminal law.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSNs: | 0026-7961 (print) |
| Related URLs: | |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law (General) |
| Divisions: | University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Law |
| Item ID: | 146653 |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Apr 2010 08:05 |
| Last Modified: | 22 Aug 2012 02:57 |
| Contributors: | Steele, Jenny (Author) Palmer, Philip (Author) |
| Date: | September 2008 |
| Status: | Published |
| URI: | http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146653 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |


