The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of hydrophone near-field scans and optical techniques for characterising high frequency sonar transducers

A comparison of hydrophone near-field scans and optical techniques for characterising high frequency sonar transducers
A comparison of hydrophone near-field scans and optical techniques for characterising high frequency sonar transducers
Two potential methods of fully characterising the response of high frequency sonar transducers and arrays operating in the frequency range 100 kHz to 500 kHz are compared. In the first approach two-dimensional planar scans, with a spatial resolution of better than half a wavelength, are performed in the acoustic near-field using a small probe hydrophone. The measured two-dimensional data are propagated numerically using a Fourier Transform method to predict the far-field response. Alternatively the data can be back-propagated to re-construct the pressure distribution at the source, a powerful diagnostic technique which can identify defects in transducers and array elements. The second approach uses a scanning laser vibrometer to measure the velocity of the transducer surface; with the resulting velocity data also being used to predict the far-field response by numerical propagation. The two approaches are compared for a number of devices. Comparison of the propagated hydrophone near-field scan data with direct measurements at these ranges shows very good agreement, indicating the usefulness of the method for deriving far-field transducer responses from near-field measurements in laboratory tanks. The potential limitations introduced to the optical approach by the acousto-optic effect are discussed.
3436-3437
Société Française d'Acoustique
Humphrey, V.F.
23c9bd0c-7870-428f-b0dd-5ff158d22590
Robinson, S.P.
00d341a1-6153-45db-bda4-666928a652e5
Theobald, P.D.
236fc379-85f5-405f-9994-f9b07b14b8fa
Hayman, G.
c767c64a-8eb5-4415-8af3-55d125730818
Cooling, M.P.
caf6c2e0-c385-4f8c-bec6-7dd0473f65af
Zakharia, Manell E.
Cassereau, Didier
Luppé, Francine
Humphrey, V.F.
23c9bd0c-7870-428f-b0dd-5ff158d22590
Robinson, S.P.
00d341a1-6153-45db-bda4-666928a652e5
Theobald, P.D.
236fc379-85f5-405f-9994-f9b07b14b8fa
Hayman, G.
c767c64a-8eb5-4415-8af3-55d125730818
Cooling, M.P.
caf6c2e0-c385-4f8c-bec6-7dd0473f65af
Zakharia, Manell E.
Cassereau, Didier
Luppé, Francine

Humphrey, V.F., Robinson, S.P., Theobald, P.D., Hayman, G. and Cooling, M.P. (2008) A comparison of hydrophone near-field scans and optical techniques for characterising high frequency sonar transducers. Zakharia, Manell E., Cassereau, Didier and Luppé, Francine (eds.) In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics ECUA 2008. Société Française d'Acoustique. pp. 3436-3437 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Two potential methods of fully characterising the response of high frequency sonar transducers and arrays operating in the frequency range 100 kHz to 500 kHz are compared. In the first approach two-dimensional planar scans, with a spatial resolution of better than half a wavelength, are performed in the acoustic near-field using a small probe hydrophone. The measured two-dimensional data are propagated numerically using a Fourier Transform method to predict the far-field response. Alternatively the data can be back-propagated to re-construct the pressure distribution at the source, a powerful diagnostic technique which can identify defects in transducers and array elements. The second approach uses a scanning laser vibrometer to measure the velocity of the transducer surface; with the resulting velocity data also being used to predict the far-field response by numerical propagation. The two approaches are compared for a number of devices. Comparison of the propagated hydrophone near-field scan data with direct measurements at these ranges shows very good agreement, indicating the usefulness of the method for deriving far-field transducer responses from near-field measurements in laboratory tanks. The potential limitations introduced to the optical approach by the acousto-optic effect are discussed.

Text
001636.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2008
Additional Information: This record mistakenly listed the publication date as 1970 instead of 2008 until it was corrected on 19th October 2022.
Venue - Dates: 9th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics ECUA2008, Paris, France, 2008-06-29 - 2008-07-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 146715
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/146715
PURE UUID: 2ea08170-f85f-4959-91b5-15178a5a61c7
ORCID for V.F. Humphrey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-5373

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Apr 2010 09:29
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: V.F. Humphrey ORCID iD
Author: S.P. Robinson
Author: P.D. Theobald
Author: G. Hayman
Author: M.P. Cooling
Editor: Manell E. Zakharia
Editor: Didier Cassereau
Editor: Francine Luppé

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×