Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special?


Schmidt, Hedvig (2008) Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special? In, Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver, Gallego, Beatriz Conde and Enchelmaier, Stefan (eds.) Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms? Dordrecht, NL, Springer, 137-164.

Download

[img] PDF - Version of Record
Restricted to internal admin

Download (1146Kb)

Description/Abstract

Hedvig Schmidt identifies a lack of guidance from the Commission on how to establish a causal link between the abuse and the harm caused to the claimant in a private action. Under the present case-law, it is sufficient for the Commission to prove a likelihood of harm to competition. This standard of proof gives private claimants not enough to found their own case in a follow-on action. The move to a more rigorous economic analysis, Schmidt argues, would benefit these claimants but would, at the same time, raise the benchmark for those bringing an independent action in national courts.

Item Type: Book Section
ISBNs: 9783540699583 (paperback)
Related URLs:
Keywords: european union, abuse of dominant position, article 82 EC, unilateral rest, competition law, antitrust law, industrial economics, private enforcement
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Divisions: University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Law
ePrint ID: 148879
Date :
Date Event
19 August 2008Published
Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2010 09:20
Last Modified: 31 Mar 2016 13:22
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/148879

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics