Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special?
Schmidt, Hedvig (2008) Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special? In, Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver, Gallego, Beatriz Conde and Enchelmaier, Stefan (eds.) Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms? Dordrecht, NL, Springer, 137-164.
Full text not available from this repository.
Hedvig Schmidt identifies a lack of guidance from the Commission on how to establish a causal link between the abuse and the harm caused to the claimant in a private action. Under the present case-law, it is sufficient for the Commission to prove a likelihood of harm to competition. This standard of proof gives private claimants not enough to found their own case in a follow-on action. The move to a more rigorous economic analysis, Schmidt argues, would benefit these claimants but would, at the same time, raise the benchmark for those bringing an independent action in national courts.
|Item Type:||Book Section|
|Keywords:||european union, abuse of dominant position, article 82 EC, unilateral rest, competition law, antitrust law, industrial economics, private enforcement|
|Subjects:||K Law > K Law (General)|
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Law
|Date Deposited:||29 Apr 2010 09:20|
|Last Modified:||25 Apr 2013 22:28|
|Contributors:||Schmidt, Hedvig (Author)
Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver (Editor)
Gallego, Beatriz Conde (Editor)
Enchelmaier, Stefan (Editor)
|Date:||19 August 2008|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)