The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special?

Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special?
Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special?
Hedvig Schmidt identifies a lack of guidance from the Commission on how to establish a causal link between the abuse and the harm caused to the claimant in a private action. Under the present case-law, it is sufficient for the Commission to prove a likelihood of harm to competition. This standard of proof gives private claimants not enough to found their own case in a follow-on action. The move to a more rigorous economic analysis, Schmidt argues, would benefit these claimants but would, at the same time, raise the benchmark for those bringing an independent action in national courts.
european union, abuse of dominant position, article 82 EC, unilateral rest, competition law, antitrust law, industrial economics, private enforcement
978-3-540-69958-3
137-164
Springer
Schmidt, Hedvig
79ee57ca-7da9-43ea-93bc-2c3ad29e714a
Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver
Gallego, Beatriz Conde
Enchelmaier, Stefan
Schmidt, Hedvig
79ee57ca-7da9-43ea-93bc-2c3ad29e714a
Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver
Gallego, Beatriz Conde
Enchelmaier, Stefan

Schmidt, Hedvig (2008) Private enforcement - is Article 82 EC special? In, Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver, Gallego, Beatriz Conde and Enchelmaier, Stefan (eds.) Abuse of Dominant Position: New Interpretation, New Enforcement Mechanisms? Dordrecht, NL. Springer, pp. 137-164.

Record type: Book Section

Abstract

Hedvig Schmidt identifies a lack of guidance from the Commission on how to establish a causal link between the abuse and the harm caused to the claimant in a private action. Under the present case-law, it is sufficient for the Commission to prove a likelihood of harm to competition. This standard of proof gives private claimants not enough to found their own case in a follow-on action. The move to a more rigorous economic analysis, Schmidt argues, would benefit these claimants but would, at the same time, raise the benchmark for those bringing an independent action in national courts.

Text
148879SCHMIDT20.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 19 August 2008
Keywords: european union, abuse of dominant position, article 82 EC, unilateral rest, competition law, antitrust law, industrial economics, private enforcement
Organisations: Law

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 148879
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/148879
ISBN: 978-3-540-69958-3
PURE UUID: 5a14a974-47df-413e-8a75-2ab692e19a69
ORCID for Hedvig Schmidt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-1377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Apr 2010 09:20
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:51

Export record

Contributors

Author: Hedvig Schmidt ORCID iD
Editor: Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt
Editor: Beatriz Conde Gallego
Editor: Stefan Enchelmaier

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×