The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer
Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer
Background: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here.

Methods: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)



1273-1281
Valle, Juan
33830bc4-19fa-4140-af0d-1b1add1fbc6b
Wasan, Harpreet
52f35b3b-1dd6-4e96-993b-0f3d8f0db440
Palmer, Daniel H.
30c22255-e50c-422e-85a1-853ae75ff2b8
Cunningham, David
c40c8fe4-7eac-4b98-aaa5-b866da1e32ab
Anthoney, Alan
a9fdb3a0-aec6-45da-8532-3f73bd01b730
Maraveyas, Anthony
d3b63674-d174-461a-b4d3-c561f9666440
Madhusudan, Srinivasan
b09d6e47-8c8f-484f-83cf-e77c2de21952
Iveson, Tim
867cb6c5-ea9a-4521-a4cc-4cd4d2503b3a
Hughes, Sharon
06f71f79-53a2-4047-80fe-a234c5e7cfa8
Pereira, Stephen P.
3e7415aa-af33-4398-a8f7-1e5938d93cec
Roughton, Michael
4bf37307-979f-4739-8df6-6ed5a085a4bd
Bridgewater, John
a7c51f93-a80e-4b89-828f-34f477259d5c
Valle, Juan
33830bc4-19fa-4140-af0d-1b1add1fbc6b
Wasan, Harpreet
52f35b3b-1dd6-4e96-993b-0f3d8f0db440
Palmer, Daniel H.
30c22255-e50c-422e-85a1-853ae75ff2b8
Cunningham, David
c40c8fe4-7eac-4b98-aaa5-b866da1e32ab
Anthoney, Alan
a9fdb3a0-aec6-45da-8532-3f73bd01b730
Maraveyas, Anthony
d3b63674-d174-461a-b4d3-c561f9666440
Madhusudan, Srinivasan
b09d6e47-8c8f-484f-83cf-e77c2de21952
Iveson, Tim
867cb6c5-ea9a-4521-a4cc-4cd4d2503b3a
Hughes, Sharon
06f71f79-53a2-4047-80fe-a234c5e7cfa8
Pereira, Stephen P.
3e7415aa-af33-4398-a8f7-1e5938d93cec
Roughton, Michael
4bf37307-979f-4739-8df6-6ed5a085a4bd
Bridgewater, John
a7c51f93-a80e-4b89-828f-34f477259d5c

Valle, Juan, Wasan, Harpreet, Palmer, Daniel H., Cunningham, David, Anthoney, Alan, Maraveyas, Anthony, Madhusudan, Srinivasan, Iveson, Tim, Hughes, Sharon, Pereira, Stephen P., Roughton, Michael and Bridgewater, John (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 362 (14), 1273-1281.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here.

Methods: We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin–gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions: As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769 [ClinicalTrials.gov] .)



This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 8 April 2010

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 150065
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/150065
PURE UUID: c8b74287-4ef5-4eec-96e4-d3ac179c74de
ORCID for Tim Iveson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-2712

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 May 2010 11:58
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:42

Export record

Contributors

Author: Juan Valle
Author: Harpreet Wasan
Author: Daniel H. Palmer
Author: David Cunningham
Author: Alan Anthoney
Author: Anthony Maraveyas
Author: Srinivasan Madhusudan
Author: Tim Iveson ORCID iD
Author: Sharon Hughes
Author: Stephen P. Pereira
Author: Michael Roughton
Author: John Bridgewater

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×