The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A randomised comparative trial of infusional ECisF versus conventional FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: the TRAFIC trial

A randomised comparative trial of infusional ECisF versus conventional FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: the TRAFIC trial
A randomised comparative trial of infusional ECisF versus conventional FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: the TRAFIC trial
Background: the epirubicin with cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECisF) regimen was found to be highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. The UK TRAFIC (trial of adjuvant 5-FU infusional chemotherapy) trial (CRUK/95/007) compared this schedule with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC60) as adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer.

Methods: in this multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, 349 women were randomly assigned to receive i.v. ECisF [epirubicin 60 mg/m2, day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, day 1 and 5-FU 200 mg/m2 by daily 24-h infusion (n = 172)] or FEC [5-FU 600 mg/m2, day 1, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, day 1 (n = 177)]. Both treatments were delivered every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free interval (RFI). TRAFIC is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 83324925).

Results: all randomised patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 112 months, there was no significant difference in RFI between the treatment groups [hazard ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.60–1.19); P = 0.33]. Toxic effects were more frequent in patients allocated to ECisF.

Conclusions: while limited by size, TRAFIC has long follow-up. No evidence of a clinically worthwhile benefit for the infusional treatment compared with standard treatment was observed which would justify further investigation or widespread use.
breast cancer, chemotherapy, cisplatin, infusional 5-FU, phase III, randomised
0923-7534
Sirohi, B.
686d4c9c-a07d-454d-b028-44f270417e15
A'Hern, R.
76816aa6-d10a-488f-b4e0-45e40fea5cee
Coombes, G.
d5baca64-5727-4aac-a3f9-e5f49aeb9700
Bliss, J.M.
84e229a6-c019-47ef-92bb-0875b13f5c18
Hickish, T.
d17bf903-3f13-4b46-9389-f0f458083442
Perren, T.
216d4066-7787-4af7-a0cf-161349503a0c
Crawford, M.
8442a93d-670d-470c-a44b-65d7d9bc7080
O'Brien, M.
8f471ec3-2a15-4f39-a1f8-d0c485b102e3
Iveson, T.
867cb6c5-ea9a-4521-a4cc-4cd4d2503b3a
Ebbs, S.
b504f0a0-6bc6-4f31-91d8-5edb75c601ee
Skene, A.
f65343a8-e3c5-4d9e-a4f9-531960676e41
Laing, R.
f6d6712f-478d-432f-9af2-d9917298dfd3
Smith, I.E.
01c40ae7-eee0-43df-8650-52acf0ae6c77
Sirohi, B.
686d4c9c-a07d-454d-b028-44f270417e15
A'Hern, R.
76816aa6-d10a-488f-b4e0-45e40fea5cee
Coombes, G.
d5baca64-5727-4aac-a3f9-e5f49aeb9700
Bliss, J.M.
84e229a6-c019-47ef-92bb-0875b13f5c18
Hickish, T.
d17bf903-3f13-4b46-9389-f0f458083442
Perren, T.
216d4066-7787-4af7-a0cf-161349503a0c
Crawford, M.
8442a93d-670d-470c-a44b-65d7d9bc7080
O'Brien, M.
8f471ec3-2a15-4f39-a1f8-d0c485b102e3
Iveson, T.
867cb6c5-ea9a-4521-a4cc-4cd4d2503b3a
Ebbs, S.
b504f0a0-6bc6-4f31-91d8-5edb75c601ee
Skene, A.
f65343a8-e3c5-4d9e-a4f9-531960676e41
Laing, R.
f6d6712f-478d-432f-9af2-d9917298dfd3
Smith, I.E.
01c40ae7-eee0-43df-8650-52acf0ae6c77

Sirohi, B., A'Hern, R., Coombes, G., Bliss, J.M., Hickish, T., Perren, T., Crawford, M., O'Brien, M., Iveson, T., Ebbs, S., Skene, A., Laing, R. and Smith, I.E. (2010) A randomised comparative trial of infusional ECisF versus conventional FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: the TRAFIC trial. Annals of Oncology. (doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp602).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the epirubicin with cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECisF) regimen was found to be highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and as neoadjuvant therapy. The UK TRAFIC (trial of adjuvant 5-FU infusional chemotherapy) trial (CRUK/95/007) compared this schedule with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC60) as adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer.

Methods: in this multicentre, open-label, phase III randomised controlled trial, 349 women were randomly assigned to receive i.v. ECisF [epirubicin 60 mg/m2, day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2, day 1 and 5-FU 200 mg/m2 by daily 24-h infusion (n = 172)] or FEC [5-FU 600 mg/m2, day 1, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, day 1 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, day 1 (n = 177)]. Both treatments were delivered every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was relapse-free interval (RFI). TRAFIC is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 83324925).

Results: all randomised patients were included in the intent-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 112 months, there was no significant difference in RFI between the treatment groups [hazard ratio 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.60–1.19); P = 0.33]. Toxic effects were more frequent in patients allocated to ECisF.

Conclusions: while limited by size, TRAFIC has long follow-up. No evidence of a clinically worthwhile benefit for the infusional treatment compared with standard treatment was observed which would justify further investigation or widespread use.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 21 January 2010
Keywords: breast cancer, chemotherapy, cisplatin, infusional 5-FU, phase III, randomised
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 150079
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/150079
ISSN: 0923-7534
PURE UUID: 879bfc45-cbe9-4e38-9c02-355bb48e25ea
ORCID for T. Iveson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-2712

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 May 2010 10:36
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: B. Sirohi
Author: R. A'Hern
Author: G. Coombes
Author: J.M. Bliss
Author: T. Hickish
Author: T. Perren
Author: M. Crawford
Author: M. O'Brien
Author: T. Iveson ORCID iD
Author: S. Ebbs
Author: A. Skene
Author: R. Laing
Author: I.E. Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×