The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis

The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis
The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis
Background: milder ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization (IVF) are being developed to minimize adverse effects. Mild stimulation regimens result in a decreased number of oocytes at retrieval. After conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF, a low number of oocytes are believed to represent poor ovarian reserve resulting in reduced success rates. Recent studies suggest that a similar response following mild stimulation is associated with better outcomes.

Methods: this review investigates whether the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation is associated with impaired implantation rates. Three randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the mild ovarian stimulation regimen (involving midfollicular phase initiation of FSH and GnRH co-treatment) for IVF with a conventional long GnRH agonist co-treatment stimulation protocol could be identified by means of a systematic literature search.

Results: these studies comprised a total of 592 first treatment cycles. Individual patient data analysis showed that the mild stimulation protocol results in a significant reduction of retrieved oocytes compared with conventional ovarian stimulation (median 6 versus 9, respectively, P < 0.001). Optimal embryo implantation rates were observed with 5 oocytes retrieved following mild stimulation (31%) versus 10 oocytes following conventional stimulation (29%) (P = 0.045).

Conclusions: the optimal number of retrieved oocytes depends on the ovarian stimulation regimen. After mild ovarian stimulation, a modest number of oocytes is associated with optimal implantation rates and does not reflect a poor ovarian response. Therefore, the fear of reducing the number of oocytes retrieved following mild ovarian stimulation appears to be unjustified.
implantation oocyte quality, ovarian stimulation, poor response
1355-4786
5-12
Verberg, M.F.G.
6cfc6f04-fe1f-45ac-9016-fb846dbc4a2c
Eijkemans, M.J.C.
49ac87bc-76a5-493a-8d2b-37abfb606e62
Macklon, N.S.
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Heijnen, E.M.E.W.
a3f775d4-d175-4e1b-a0c5-dc395d3fef0a
Baart, E.B.
640e29b7-c5fc-4e8e-9fc5-f2a3d497713b
Hohmann, F.P.
cbf3f16b-93d2-4253-88be-c192bafcb77f
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
c265d1e7-d207-4400-a669-7502343e3b7e
Broekmans, F.J.
17ce14de-42f9-43cb-98be-194dc9430888
Verberg, M.F.G.
6cfc6f04-fe1f-45ac-9016-fb846dbc4a2c
Eijkemans, M.J.C.
49ac87bc-76a5-493a-8d2b-37abfb606e62
Macklon, N.S.
7db1f4fc-a9f6-431f-a1f2-297bb8c9fb7e
Heijnen, E.M.E.W.
a3f775d4-d175-4e1b-a0c5-dc395d3fef0a
Baart, E.B.
640e29b7-c5fc-4e8e-9fc5-f2a3d497713b
Hohmann, F.P.
cbf3f16b-93d2-4253-88be-c192bafcb77f
Fauser, B.C.J.M.
c265d1e7-d207-4400-a669-7502343e3b7e
Broekmans, F.J.
17ce14de-42f9-43cb-98be-194dc9430888

Verberg, M.F.G., Eijkemans, M.J.C., Macklon, N.S., Heijnen, E.M.E.W., Baart, E.B., Hohmann, F.P., Fauser, B.C.J.M. and Broekmans, F.J. (2009) The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 15 (1), 5-12. (doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn053).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: milder ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization (IVF) are being developed to minimize adverse effects. Mild stimulation regimens result in a decreased number of oocytes at retrieval. After conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF, a low number of oocytes are believed to represent poor ovarian reserve resulting in reduced success rates. Recent studies suggest that a similar response following mild stimulation is associated with better outcomes.

Methods: this review investigates whether the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation is associated with impaired implantation rates. Three randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of the mild ovarian stimulation regimen (involving midfollicular phase initiation of FSH and GnRH co-treatment) for IVF with a conventional long GnRH agonist co-treatment stimulation protocol could be identified by means of a systematic literature search.

Results: these studies comprised a total of 592 first treatment cycles. Individual patient data analysis showed that the mild stimulation protocol results in a significant reduction of retrieved oocytes compared with conventional ovarian stimulation (median 6 versus 9, respectively, P < 0.001). Optimal embryo implantation rates were observed with 5 oocytes retrieved following mild stimulation (31%) versus 10 oocytes following conventional stimulation (29%) (P = 0.045).

Conclusions: the optimal number of retrieved oocytes depends on the ovarian stimulation regimen. After mild ovarian stimulation, a modest number of oocytes is associated with optimal implantation rates and does not reflect a poor ovarian response. Therefore, the fear of reducing the number of oocytes retrieved following mild ovarian stimulation appears to be unjustified.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2009
Keywords: implantation oocyte quality, ovarian stimulation, poor response

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 150717
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/150717
ISSN: 1355-4786
PURE UUID: 89778c4d-b00d-44bf-9844-57505a792138

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 May 2010 10:48
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: M.F.G. Verberg
Author: M.J.C. Eijkemans
Author: N.S. Macklon
Author: E.M.E.W. Heijnen
Author: E.B. Baart
Author: F.P. Hohmann
Author: B.C.J.M. Fauser
Author: F.J. Broekmans

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×