The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups

'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups
'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups
Aims and objectives: to investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups – collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users – in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.

Design: a qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis.

Participants and setting: thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews.

Results and conclusions: partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures
cancer services, evaluative, patient and public involvement, user involvement
1369-6513
210-220
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
Cotterell, Phil
34ced262-73fd-4635-ba0d-82fdf5c58fa2
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Sitzia, John
7aa099da-5f90-4e28-878d-c3041d6b33ca
Cotterell, Phil
34ced262-73fd-4635-ba0d-82fdf5c58fa2

Richardson, Alison, Sitzia, John and Cotterell, Phil (2005) 'Working the system'. Achieving change through partnership working: an evaluation of cancer partnership groups. Health Expectations, 8 (3), 210-220. (doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00332.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aims and objectives: to investigate the characteristics and achievements of cancer partnership groups – collaborative service improvement groups formed of NHS staff and service users – in the 34 cancer networks in England, and in particular to explore the influence that such groups had on local cancer services.

Design: a qualitative approach employing a structured telephone survey, face-to-face interviews and documentary analysis.

Participants and setting: thirty cancer networks in England with an active Partnership Group completed the telephone survey. From these 30 networks, six networks were subsequently selected from which service users and NHS professionals involved in partnership groups and NHS professionals who were non-members were recruited to take part in face-to-face interviews.

Results and conclusions: partnership groups were established in the majority of cancer networks. Typically, these groups were at network level, been established for less than a year, met once every 2 months, and were populated with both service users and health-care professionals. Five common activities and achievements were identified: establishment of the group itself; acting as a 'reference' group for consultation; networking and representation on other groups; patient information and communication and proactive influencing. Activities progressed in scale and complexity as groups evolved. Groups had learnt the basics of change management and some identified a more sophisticated understanding of change processes in the NHS as essential for the group's motivation and survival. When gauging the impact of involvement strategies it would seem important to subscribe to broad indicators of success that include both process and outcome measures

Text
Richardson_Sitzia_Cotterell_PPE_HEX_2005.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: September 2005
Keywords: cancer services, evaluative, patient and public involvement, user involvement

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 154193
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/154193
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 18e262af-1e02-422a-8534-cf3430737e0f
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Jul 2010 14:18
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:55

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: John Sitzia
Author: Phil Cotterell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×