The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Flood-formed dunes in Athabasca Valles, Mars: morphology, modeling, and implications

Flood-formed dunes in Athabasca Valles, Mars: morphology, modeling, and implications
Flood-formed dunes in Athabasca Valles, Mars: morphology, modeling, and implications
Estimates of discharge for martian outflow channels have spanned orders of magnitude due in part to uncertainties in floodwater height. A methodology of estimating discharge based on bedforms would reduce some of this uncertainty. Such a methodology based on the morphology and granulometry of flood-formed (‘diluvial’) dunes has been developed by Carling (1996b, in: Branson, J., Brown, A.G., Gregory, K.J. (Eds.), Global Continental Changes: The Context of Palaeohydrology. Geological Society Special Publication No. 115, London, UK, 165–179) and applied to Pleistocene flood-formed dunes in Siberia. Transverse periodic dune-like bedforms in Athabasca Valles, Mars, have previously been classified both as flood-formed dunes and as antidunes. Either interpretation is important, as they both imply substantial quantities of water, but each has different hydraulic implications. We undertook photoclinometric measurements of these forms, and compared them with data from flood-formed dunes in Siberia. Our analysis of those data shows their morphology to be more consistent with dunes than antidunes, thus providing the first documentation of flood-formed dunes on Mars. Other reasoning based on context and likely hydraulics also supports the bedforms' classification as dunes. Evidence does not support the dunes being aeolian, although a conclusive determination cannot be made with present data. Given the preponderance of evidence that the features are flood-formed instead of aeolian, we applied Carling's (1996b, in: Branson, J., Brown, A.G., Gregory, K.J. (Eds.), Global Continental Changes: The Context of Palaeohydrology. Geological Society Special Publication No. 115, London, UK, 165–179) dune-flow model to derive the peak discharge of the flood flow that formed them. The resultant estimate is approximately 2×106 m3/s, similar to previous estimates. The size of the Athabascan dunes' in comparison with that of terrestrial dunes suggests that these martian dunes took at least 1–2 days to grow. Their flattened morphology implies that they were formed at high subcritical flow and that the flood flow that formed them receded very quickly.
mars, surface, geological processes, surfaces, planets, terrestrial planets
0019-1035
68-83
Burr, D.
580ee13e-7321-4b79-8dc1-d97c5b396327
Carling, P.A.
8d252dd9-3c88-4803-81cc-c2ec4c6fa687
Beyer, R.A.
9c0235f2-fc56-4a7a-84e3-808be452f290
Lancaster, N.
c39635fb-0d05-41c6-a644-108ca4f3ca2e
Burr, D.
580ee13e-7321-4b79-8dc1-d97c5b396327
Carling, P.A.
8d252dd9-3c88-4803-81cc-c2ec4c6fa687
Beyer, R.A.
9c0235f2-fc56-4a7a-84e3-808be452f290
Lancaster, N.
c39635fb-0d05-41c6-a644-108ca4f3ca2e

Burr, D., Carling, P.A., Beyer, R.A. and Lancaster, N. (2004) Flood-formed dunes in Athabasca Valles, Mars: morphology, modeling, and implications. Icarus, 171 (1), 68-83. (doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.04.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Estimates of discharge for martian outflow channels have spanned orders of magnitude due in part to uncertainties in floodwater height. A methodology of estimating discharge based on bedforms would reduce some of this uncertainty. Such a methodology based on the morphology and granulometry of flood-formed (‘diluvial’) dunes has been developed by Carling (1996b, in: Branson, J., Brown, A.G., Gregory, K.J. (Eds.), Global Continental Changes: The Context of Palaeohydrology. Geological Society Special Publication No. 115, London, UK, 165–179) and applied to Pleistocene flood-formed dunes in Siberia. Transverse periodic dune-like bedforms in Athabasca Valles, Mars, have previously been classified both as flood-formed dunes and as antidunes. Either interpretation is important, as they both imply substantial quantities of water, but each has different hydraulic implications. We undertook photoclinometric measurements of these forms, and compared them with data from flood-formed dunes in Siberia. Our analysis of those data shows their morphology to be more consistent with dunes than antidunes, thus providing the first documentation of flood-formed dunes on Mars. Other reasoning based on context and likely hydraulics also supports the bedforms' classification as dunes. Evidence does not support the dunes being aeolian, although a conclusive determination cannot be made with present data. Given the preponderance of evidence that the features are flood-formed instead of aeolian, we applied Carling's (1996b, in: Branson, J., Brown, A.G., Gregory, K.J. (Eds.), Global Continental Changes: The Context of Palaeohydrology. Geological Society Special Publication No. 115, London, UK, 165–179) dune-flow model to derive the peak discharge of the flood flow that formed them. The resultant estimate is approximately 2×106 m3/s, similar to previous estimates. The size of the Athabascan dunes' in comparison with that of terrestrial dunes suggests that these martian dunes took at least 1–2 days to grow. Their flattened morphology implies that they were formed at high subcritical flow and that the flood flow that formed them receded very quickly.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: mars, surface, geological processes, surfaces, planets, terrestrial planets

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 15516
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/15516
ISSN: 0019-1035
PURE UUID: ec8ef111-5152-4998-9f62-02899124de64

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Apr 2005
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D. Burr
Author: P.A. Carling
Author: R.A. Beyer
Author: N. Lancaster

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×