The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Coccolithophore dynamics in non-bloom conditions during late summer in the central Iceland Basin (July-August 2007)

Coccolithophore dynamics in non-bloom conditions during late summer in the central Iceland Basin (July-August 2007)
Coccolithophore dynamics in non-bloom conditions during late summer in the central Iceland Basin (July-August 2007)
Measurements of primary production (PP), calcification (CF), and coccolithophore abundance were made
during late summer (July–August 2007) in the Iceland Basin. Low numbers of coccolithophore cells and detached
coccoliths (, 1 3 103 cells mL21 and 1–15 3 103 coccoliths mL21, respectively) indicated a non-bloom community,
with Emiliania huxleyi as the dominant coccolithophore in terms of abundance, coccolithophore organic biomass,
and cell calcite. PP ranged from 0.1 to 2 mmol C m23 d21, while CF ranged from 10 to 250 mmol C m23 d21, with
both typically decreasing with depth. Coccolithophores were estimated to contribute 10–20% toward total
chlorophyll a, phytoplankton carbon, and PP within the euphotic zone. In these non-bloom conditions, , 30–60%
of the total calcite in the water column was present as detached coccoliths rather than whole cells. Both cell numbers
and variability in cell-normalized CF controlled the magnitude of total CF, and hence both physiological limits to
cell CF and growth, as well as mortality factors, need to be taken into account when examining oceanic
coccolithophore communities. Combining cell-normalized CF with an estimate of coccolith calcite gave coccolith
production rates (0.4–1.8 h21) similar to those reported in the literature for laboratory cultures of E. huxleyi. None
of the factors currently associated with coccolithophore blooms (irradiance, mixed-layer depth, nitrate, phosphate,
or calcite saturation) showed a clear correlation with community or cellular CF. Hence, although mortality is likely
to control cell numbers, other factors such as trace metal (iron) availability may influence coccolithophore
physiology in the central Iceland Basin during late summer.
0024-3590
1601-1613
Poulton, Alex J.
14bf64a7-d617-4913-b882-e8495543e717
Charalampopoulou, Anastasia
2b5d63cd-be8f-45d2-95cd-68cb591d7407
Young, Jeremy R.
18d63549-d248-4012-91b1-64382581ef53
Tarran, Glen A.
218a9233-a6ae-4d0c-a9ca-35ad0d5a35f7
Lucas, Mike I.
3bb72027-86ed-4063-bf0d-ed9a667fc50e
Quartly, Graham D.
3d1e4e87-f001-4d18-b95f-9bca4db6ff9d
Poulton, Alex J.
14bf64a7-d617-4913-b882-e8495543e717
Charalampopoulou, Anastasia
2b5d63cd-be8f-45d2-95cd-68cb591d7407
Young, Jeremy R.
18d63549-d248-4012-91b1-64382581ef53
Tarran, Glen A.
218a9233-a6ae-4d0c-a9ca-35ad0d5a35f7
Lucas, Mike I.
3bb72027-86ed-4063-bf0d-ed9a667fc50e
Quartly, Graham D.
3d1e4e87-f001-4d18-b95f-9bca4db6ff9d

Poulton, Alex J., Charalampopoulou, Anastasia, Young, Jeremy R., Tarran, Glen A., Lucas, Mike I. and Quartly, Graham D. (2010) Coccolithophore dynamics in non-bloom conditions during late summer in the central Iceland Basin (July-August 2007). Limnology and Oceanography, 55 (4), 1601-1613. (doi:10.4319/lo.2010.55.4.1601).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Measurements of primary production (PP), calcification (CF), and coccolithophore abundance were made
during late summer (July–August 2007) in the Iceland Basin. Low numbers of coccolithophore cells and detached
coccoliths (, 1 3 103 cells mL21 and 1–15 3 103 coccoliths mL21, respectively) indicated a non-bloom community,
with Emiliania huxleyi as the dominant coccolithophore in terms of abundance, coccolithophore organic biomass,
and cell calcite. PP ranged from 0.1 to 2 mmol C m23 d21, while CF ranged from 10 to 250 mmol C m23 d21, with
both typically decreasing with depth. Coccolithophores were estimated to contribute 10–20% toward total
chlorophyll a, phytoplankton carbon, and PP within the euphotic zone. In these non-bloom conditions, , 30–60%
of the total calcite in the water column was present as detached coccoliths rather than whole cells. Both cell numbers
and variability in cell-normalized CF controlled the magnitude of total CF, and hence both physiological limits to
cell CF and growth, as well as mortality factors, need to be taken into account when examining oceanic
coccolithophore communities. Combining cell-normalized CF with an estimate of coccolith calcite gave coccolith
production rates (0.4–1.8 h21) similar to those reported in the literature for laboratory cultures of E. huxleyi. None
of the factors currently associated with coccolithophore blooms (irradiance, mixed-layer depth, nitrate, phosphate,
or calcite saturation) showed a clear correlation with community or cellular CF. Hence, although mortality is likely
to control cell numbers, other factors such as trace metal (iron) availability may influence coccolithophore
physiology in the central Iceland Basin during late summer.

Text
Poulton_L&O_Post-print_2010.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: July 2010
Organisations: Marine Biogeochemistry, Marine Physics and Ocean Climate

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 161281
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/161281
ISSN: 0024-3590
PURE UUID: 508c23de-7fd2-44bd-8138-da534ab4c562

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jul 2010 13:48
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 01:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alex J. Poulton
Author: Anastasia Charalampopoulou
Author: Jeremy R. Young
Author: Glen A. Tarran
Author: Mike I. Lucas
Author: Graham D. Quartly

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×