The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Where are we at? An empirical study of levels and methods of evaluating continuing professional development

Where are we at? An empirical study of levels and methods of evaluating continuing professional development
Where are we at? An empirical study of levels and methods of evaluating continuing professional development
While the importance of CPD is widely acknowledged by the profession, evaluation of the impact of CPD is rarely undertaken in a systematic manner. In this survey study of teachers and CPD coordinators in England we looked at the extent to which CPD is evaluated at different levels of Guskey’s (2000) hierarchical model of evaluation of professional development.

Findings suggest that the Guskey model can be usefully employed to characterise levels of CPD evaluation in English schools. Evaluation of CPD is most likely to take the form of measuring participant satisfaction. However, there was evidence of multi-level evaluation happening in many schools, encompassing participant learning and value for money as well as participant satisfaction.
0141-1926
195-211
Muijs, Daniel
62af2eff-0cb5-403b-81cc-7a3bfb3e640e
Lindsay, Geoff
3b2ffb77-310b-4306-9fba-2f191e4ff809
Muijs, Daniel
62af2eff-0cb5-403b-81cc-7a3bfb3e640e
Lindsay, Geoff
3b2ffb77-310b-4306-9fba-2f191e4ff809

Muijs, Daniel and Lindsay, Geoff (2008) Where are we at? An empirical study of levels and methods of evaluating continuing professional development. British Educational Research Journal, 34 (2), 195-211. (doi:10.1080/01411920701532194).

Record type: Article

Abstract

While the importance of CPD is widely acknowledged by the profession, evaluation of the impact of CPD is rarely undertaken in a systematic manner. In this survey study of teachers and CPD coordinators in England we looked at the extent to which CPD is evaluated at different levels of Guskey’s (2000) hierarchical model of evaluation of professional development.

Findings suggest that the Guskey model can be usefully employed to characterise levels of CPD evaluation in English schools. Evaluation of CPD is most likely to take the form of measuring participant satisfaction. However, there was evidence of multi-level evaluation happening in many schools, encompassing participant learning and value for money as well as participant satisfaction.

Text
CPD_evaluation_article_final_revised_b.doc - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: April 2008

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 165899
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/165899
ISSN: 0141-1926
PURE UUID: e6795678-f398-4fad-8344-ca68894364cc
ORCID for Daniel Muijs: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-8921

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Oct 2010 10:49
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:12

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Muijs ORCID iD
Author: Geoff Lindsay

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×