A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems
A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems
Several numerical methods using non-polynomial interpolation have been proposed for wave propagation problems at high frequencies. The common feature of these methods is that in each element, the solution is approximated by a set of local solutions. They can provide very accurate solutions with a much smaller number of degrees of freedom compared to polynomial interpolation. There are however significant differences in the way the matching conditions enforcing the continuity of the solution between elements can be formulated. The similarities and discrepancies between several non-polynomial numerical methods are discussed in the context of the Helmholtz equation. The present comparison is concerned with the ultra-weak variational formulation (UWVF), the least-squares method (LSM) and the discontinuous Galerkin method with numerical flux (DGM). An analysis in terms of Trefftz methods provides an interesting insight into the properties of these methods. Second, the UWVF and the LSM are reformulated in a similar fashion to that of the DGM. This offers a unified framework to understand the properties of several non-polynomial methods. Numerical results are also presented to put in perspective the relative accuracy of the methods. The numerical accuracies of the methods are compared with the interpolation errors of the wave bases.
380-402
Gabard, G.
bfd82aee-20f2-4e2c-ad92-087dc8ff6ce7
Gamallo, P.
4a10847b-5368-4f60-aab6-19a80b8556c9
Huttunen, T.
014b99e4-1caa-47d9-a283-705c60cf4c12
2011
Gabard, G.
bfd82aee-20f2-4e2c-ad92-087dc8ff6ce7
Gamallo, P.
4a10847b-5368-4f60-aab6-19a80b8556c9
Huttunen, T.
014b99e4-1caa-47d9-a283-705c60cf4c12
Gabard, G., Gamallo, P. and Huttunen, T.
(2011)
A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 85, .
(doi:10.1002/nme.2979).
Abstract
Several numerical methods using non-polynomial interpolation have been proposed for wave propagation problems at high frequencies. The common feature of these methods is that in each element, the solution is approximated by a set of local solutions. They can provide very accurate solutions with a much smaller number of degrees of freedom compared to polynomial interpolation. There are however significant differences in the way the matching conditions enforcing the continuity of the solution between elements can be formulated. The similarities and discrepancies between several non-polynomial numerical methods are discussed in the context of the Helmholtz equation. The present comparison is concerned with the ultra-weak variational formulation (UWVF), the least-squares method (LSM) and the discontinuous Galerkin method with numerical flux (DGM). An analysis in terms of Trefftz methods provides an interesting insight into the properties of these methods. Second, the UWVF and the LSM are reformulated in a similar fashion to that of the DGM. This offers a unified framework to understand the properties of several non-polynomial methods. Numerical results are also presented to put in perspective the relative accuracy of the methods. The numerical accuracies of the methods are compared with the interpolation errors of the wave bases.
Text
gabard11.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 2011
Organisations:
Acoustics Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 172735
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/172735
ISSN: 0029-5981
PURE UUID: 3724970e-6d93-4086-a1cf-e4ad62a51a01
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Jan 2011 11:55
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:29
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
G. Gabard
Author:
P. Gamallo
Author:
T. Huttunen
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics