The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems

A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems
A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems
Several numerical methods using non-polynomial interpolation have been proposed for wave propagation problems at high frequencies. The common feature of these methods is that in each element, the solution is approximated by a set of local solutions. They can provide very accurate solutions with a much smaller number of degrees of freedom compared to polynomial interpolation. There are however significant differences in the way the matching conditions enforcing the continuity of the solution between elements can be formulated. The similarities and discrepancies between several non-polynomial numerical methods are discussed in the context of the Helmholtz equation. The present comparison is concerned with the ultra-weak variational formulation (UWVF), the least-squares method (LSM) and the discontinuous Galerkin method with numerical flux (DGM). An analysis in terms of Trefftz methods provides an interesting insight into the properties of these methods. Second, the UWVF and the LSM are reformulated in a similar fashion to that of the DGM. This offers a unified framework to understand the properties of several non-polynomial methods. Numerical results are also presented to put in perspective the relative accuracy of the methods. The numerical accuracies of the methods are compared with the interpolation errors of the wave bases.
0029-5981
380-402
Gabard, G.
bfd82aee-20f2-4e2c-ad92-087dc8ff6ce7
Gamallo, P.
4a10847b-5368-4f60-aab6-19a80b8556c9
Huttunen, T.
014b99e4-1caa-47d9-a283-705c60cf4c12
Gabard, G.
bfd82aee-20f2-4e2c-ad92-087dc8ff6ce7
Gamallo, P.
4a10847b-5368-4f60-aab6-19a80b8556c9
Huttunen, T.
014b99e4-1caa-47d9-a283-705c60cf4c12

Gabard, G., Gamallo, P. and Huttunen, T. (2011) A comparison of wave-based discontinuous Galerkin, ultra-weak and least-square methods for wave problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 85, 380-402. (doi:10.1002/nme.2979).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Several numerical methods using non-polynomial interpolation have been proposed for wave propagation problems at high frequencies. The common feature of these methods is that in each element, the solution is approximated by a set of local solutions. They can provide very accurate solutions with a much smaller number of degrees of freedom compared to polynomial interpolation. There are however significant differences in the way the matching conditions enforcing the continuity of the solution between elements can be formulated. The similarities and discrepancies between several non-polynomial numerical methods are discussed in the context of the Helmholtz equation. The present comparison is concerned with the ultra-weak variational formulation (UWVF), the least-squares method (LSM) and the discontinuous Galerkin method with numerical flux (DGM). An analysis in terms of Trefftz methods provides an interesting insight into the properties of these methods. Second, the UWVF and the LSM are reformulated in a similar fashion to that of the DGM. This offers a unified framework to understand the properties of several non-polynomial methods. Numerical results are also presented to put in perspective the relative accuracy of the methods. The numerical accuracies of the methods are compared with the interpolation errors of the wave bases.

Text
gabard11.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2011
Organisations: Acoustics Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 172735
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/172735
ISSN: 0029-5981
PURE UUID: 3724970e-6d93-4086-a1cf-e4ad62a51a01

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Jan 2011 11:55
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G. Gabard
Author: P. Gamallo
Author: T. Huttunen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×