The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Impairment of kidney function and reduced quality-of-life in older people: a cross-sectional study

Impairment of kidney function and reduced quality-of-life in older people: a cross-sectional study
Impairment of kidney function and reduced quality-of-life in older people: a cross-sectional study
Objective: to assess the association of kidney function with quality-of-life in community-dwelling older adults aged 75 years or more in the UK.

Design: cross-sectional study.

Setting: primary care; 12 UK general practices participating in a cluster trial of health screening.

Subjects: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2) using the four-variable modified diet in renal disease equation was derived in 1,195 men and 1,772 women with available bloods, these were 92% of 3,211 study participants who consented to interviews and 73% of those invited into the original cluster trial of health screening.

Main outcome measures: interviews by trained fieldworker using the Sickness Impact Profile (home management, mobility, self-care, social interaction), and the Philadelphia Geriatric Morale Scale. Higher scores imply worse quality-of-life in a given domain.

Results: in age- and co-morbidity-adjusted analyses there was an association of eGFR <45 and the highest scores (defined as ?median) of mobility (men: odds ratio (OR) 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56–5.41; women: OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02–2.94), home management (men: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.04; women: OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.18–10.35), social interaction (men: OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.73–6.45; women: 2.64, 95% CI 1.61–4.33) when compared with those with eGFR ?60 and who reported no problems. Men with eGFR <45 had low morale (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.02–5.87) but this was not found for women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.65–3.04), whereas women (but not men) with eGFR <45 reported problems with body care (women: OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.25–2.27: men: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.55–1.46).

Conclusions: an eGFR <45 is associated with poorer quality-of-life at older age. More research is needed to identify modifiable causes to improve quality-of-life in older people with such a degree of kidney function impairment
0002-0729
381-387
Nitsch, Dorothea
154b7a47-f777-4daa-b984-37447a6ad886
Mann, Andrea G.
2cd35f78-683f-478c-ab6e-4e4505ad39b9
Bulpitt, Christopher
7f33b571-f6ce-42f6-b39b-61b3abbca608
Roderick, Paul J.
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Fletcher, A
ed874fc9-f56e-4d62-8002-31de7153d686
Nitsch, Dorothea
154b7a47-f777-4daa-b984-37447a6ad886
Mann, Andrea G.
2cd35f78-683f-478c-ab6e-4e4505ad39b9
Bulpitt, Christopher
7f33b571-f6ce-42f6-b39b-61b3abbca608
Roderick, Paul J.
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Fletcher, A
ed874fc9-f56e-4d62-8002-31de7153d686

Nitsch, Dorothea, Mann, Andrea G., Bulpitt, Christopher, Roderick, Paul J. and Fletcher, A (2011) Impairment of kidney function and reduced quality-of-life in older people: a cross-sectional study. Age and Ageing, 40 (3), 381-387. (doi:10.1093/ageing/afr024). (PMID:21427113)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: to assess the association of kidney function with quality-of-life in community-dwelling older adults aged 75 years or more in the UK.

Design: cross-sectional study.

Setting: primary care; 12 UK general practices participating in a cluster trial of health screening.

Subjects: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2) using the four-variable modified diet in renal disease equation was derived in 1,195 men and 1,772 women with available bloods, these were 92% of 3,211 study participants who consented to interviews and 73% of those invited into the original cluster trial of health screening.

Main outcome measures: interviews by trained fieldworker using the Sickness Impact Profile (home management, mobility, self-care, social interaction), and the Philadelphia Geriatric Morale Scale. Higher scores imply worse quality-of-life in a given domain.

Results: in age- and co-morbidity-adjusted analyses there was an association of eGFR <45 and the highest scores (defined as ?median) of mobility (men: odds ratio (OR) 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.56–5.41; women: OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02–2.94), home management (men: OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.04; women: OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.18–10.35), social interaction (men: OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.73–6.45; women: 2.64, 95% CI 1.61–4.33) when compared with those with eGFR ?60 and who reported no problems. Men with eGFR <45 had low morale (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.02–5.87) but this was not found for women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.65–3.04), whereas women (but not men) with eGFR <45 reported problems with body care (women: OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.25–2.27: men: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.55–1.46).

Conclusions: an eGFR <45 is associated with poorer quality-of-life at older age. More research is needed to identify modifiable causes to improve quality-of-life in older people with such a degree of kidney function impairment

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: March 2011
Published date: May 2011
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 181261
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/181261
ISSN: 0002-0729
PURE UUID: 6671786d-4d71-4dea-9ec9-d35c9349a48f
ORCID for Paul J. Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Apr 2011 08:23
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dorothea Nitsch
Author: Andrea G. Mann
Author: Christopher Bulpitt
Author: A Fletcher

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×