The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Performance indicators for primary care groups an evidence based approach

Performance indicators for primary care groups an evidence based approach
Performance indicators for primary care groups an evidence based approach
In England primary care groups will have a key role in promoting the health and improving the health care of their local population.1 By April 1999 these groups, involving all primary care professionals, will provide and commission health care for roughly 100 000 people in each locality. Primary care groups will be accountable to health authorities and “will agree targets for improving health, health services and value for money.”1There will be several primary care groups in each district health authority. This new approach offers primary care the opportunity to further integrate health promotion and health care at the individual and population levels.

The present UK government intends to manage the performance of the “new NHS”; the word performance appeared 88 times in its recent white paper.1 It has published a national framework for assessing performance as a consultation document,2and primary care groups within health authorities will be judged to have “performed” well on the basis of the indicators listed in table 1. Most are attributable in part to primary care, but only some are linked to interventions that will necessarily lead to improved health outcomes. The government has also proposed four targets for England in its green paper Our Healthier Nation.3 Approaches taken by health authorities, and presumably by primary care groups, will be “fully monitored by the Regional Offices of the NHS Executive.”3 These targets for reduced death rates from heart disease and stroke, cancer, suicide, and accidents are all outcome indicators but, again, are only partly attributable to primary care.
0959-8138
1354-1360
McColl, Alastair
d1d3bc6b-2a2c-41ca-9e5b-e0c0f8161321
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Gabbay, John
d779b76c-febe-461b-b3bb-e110163f114a
Smith, Helen
e9ebdc59-6964-49b5-a2cd-b76d58ab77e1
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
McColl, Alastair
d1d3bc6b-2a2c-41ca-9e5b-e0c0f8161321
Roderick, Paul
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Gabbay, John
d779b76c-febe-461b-b3bb-e110163f114a
Smith, Helen
e9ebdc59-6964-49b5-a2cd-b76d58ab77e1
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99

McColl, Alastair, Roderick, Paul, Gabbay, John, Smith, Helen and Moore, Michael (1998) Performance indicators for primary care groups an evidence based approach. BMJ, 317, 1354-1360. (PMID:9812935)

Record type: Article

Abstract

In England primary care groups will have a key role in promoting the health and improving the health care of their local population.1 By April 1999 these groups, involving all primary care professionals, will provide and commission health care for roughly 100 000 people in each locality. Primary care groups will be accountable to health authorities and “will agree targets for improving health, health services and value for money.”1There will be several primary care groups in each district health authority. This new approach offers primary care the opportunity to further integrate health promotion and health care at the individual and population levels.

The present UK government intends to manage the performance of the “new NHS”; the word performance appeared 88 times in its recent white paper.1 It has published a national framework for assessing performance as a consultation document,2and primary care groups within health authorities will be judged to have “performed” well on the basis of the indicators listed in table 1. Most are attributable in part to primary care, but only some are linked to interventions that will necessarily lead to improved health outcomes. The government has also proposed four targets for England in its green paper Our Healthier Nation.3 Approaches taken by health authorities, and presumably by primary care groups, will be “fully monitored by the Regional Offices of the NHS Executive.”3 These targets for reduced death rates from heart disease and stroke, cancer, suicide, and accidents are all outcome indicators but, again, are only partly attributable to primary care.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 14 November 1998

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 181701
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/181701
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 85261b50-7072-4788-b970-9bdaeea39414
ORCID for Paul Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2011 08:48
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:54

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alastair McColl
Author: Paul Roderick ORCID iD
Author: John Gabbay
Author: Helen Smith
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×