Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders


Hallowell, Nina, Cooke, Sarah, Crawford, Gillian, Parker, Michael and Lucassen, Anneke (2008) Ethics and research governance: the views of researchers, health-care professionals and other stakeholders. Clinical Ethics, 3, (2), 85-90. (doi:10.1258/ce.2008.008014).

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Description/Abstract

The objective of this study is to describe researchers', health-care providers' and other stakeholders' views of ethical review and research governance procedures. The study design involved qualitative semi-structured interviews. Participants included 60 individuals who either undertook research in the subspecialty of cancer genetics (n = 40) or were involved in biomedical research in other capacities (n = 20), e.g. research governance and oversight, patient support groups or research funding. While all interviewees observed that oversight is necessary to protect research participants, ethical review and research governance (ERG) arrangements were described negatively throughout these interviews. Interviewees identified a number of problems with ERG, including: over-bureaucratization, over-standardization of information requirements for different types of research, a lack of standardization in the types of information required by different committees for the same research and a lack of consistency in different committees' responses. A number of solutions were proposed including streamlining application procedures and harmonizing committees' responses and information requirements. Recent reports suggest that ethical review procedures and research governance arrangements threaten the possibility of undertaking clinical research in the UK, hence the introduction of the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) is long overdue. However, while IRAS may solve some of the problems identified by interviewees, it remains to be seen to what extent it will impact upon the very negative perceptions of ethics and research governance procedures reported here.

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 1477-7509 (print)
1758-101X (electronic)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Divisions: University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Medicine > Cancer Sciences
ePrint ID: 182515
Date Deposited: 19 Apr 2011 16:43
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2014 19:38
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/182515

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item