Midnight census revisited: Reliability of patient day measurements in US hospital units


Simon, Michael, Yankovskyy, Eugene, Klaus, Susan, Gajewski, Byron and Dunton, Nancy (2011) Midnight census revisited: Reliability of patient day measurements in US hospital units. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, (1), 56-61. (doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.07.002). (PMID:20673896).

Download

[img] PDF - Publishers print
Restricted to internal admin

Download (249Kb)
[img] Microsoft Word - Post print
Download (243Kb)

Description/Abstract

Background: Patient days are widely used in nurse staffing research and for nursing quality measurement. Nursing hours per patient day (NHPPD) and fall rates incorporate patient days in the denominator and are endorsed by the US National Quality Forum (NQF) as nursing sensitive consensus measures. Measurement error introduced by patient days would affect the accuracy of these nursing quality indicators.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of five patient day reporting methods accepted by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). The specific aims were (1) to investigate the agreement of five patient day measurements with a defined quasi-gold standard, (2) to explore method bias by investigating the association of potential confounding variables with the differences between the routine measurements and the quasi-gold standard, and (3) to extrapolate the potential effect of bias of the patient day methods on nursing quality indicators.

Design: A multiple census study with a national convenience sample of hospital units in the US was conducted.

Setting: 260 out of 282 units (92%) from 54 hospitals sent bi-hourly patient census data for seven randomly selected days in September 2008.

Methods: The multiple census data comprised the quasi-gold standard and was compared with data routinely submitted to the database. Intraclass correlations were calculated for an agreement analysis. A Bayesian regression analysis was conducted to explore the impact of different data collection methods and the degree of short stay patients.

Results: Overall agreement between routine data and the quasi-gold standard was excellent (ICC [95% CI]: 0.967 [0.958–0.974]). A Bayesian regression analysis identified that two methods underestimated patient days and an interaction between the degrees of short stay patients and one of the data collection methods also affected patient day measurement by up to 7.6%.

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 0020-7489 (print)
Keywords: midnight census, nursing administration research, nursing quality indicator, patient days, personnel staffing and scheduling, quality indicators
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HA Statistics
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
R Medicine > RT Nursing
Divisions: University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Health Sciences
ePrint ID: 186187
Date Deposited: 12 May 2011 13:34
Last Modified: 14 Apr 2014 10:59
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/186187

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics