The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A survey of the quality and accuracy of information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from UK general practices and community pharmacies

A survey of the quality and accuracy of information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from UK general practices and community pharmacies
A survey of the quality and accuracy of information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from UK general practices and community pharmacies
Background: better information promotes sun protection behaviour and is associated with earlier presentation and survival for malignant melanoma.

Aim: to assess the quality of patient information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from general practices and community pharmacies.

Design of study: a structured review of patient information leaflets.

Setting: all community pharmacies and general practices in one Primary Care Trust were invited to supply leaflets.

Methods: readability was assessed using the SMOG scoring system. Presentation and content were reviewed using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) guidelines. Three consultant dermatologists assessed each leaflet for accuracy.

Results: thirty-one different patient information leaflets were returned. Thirteen (42\%) were published in the previous 2 years, but 10 (32\%) were over 5 years old. Nine (29\%) leaflets were produced by the NHS or Health Education Authority, and 8 (27\%) were linked to a commercial organization. One leaflet had readability in the primary education range (SMOG score = 6), and none with the recommended range for health education material (SMOG score {$\leq$} 5). Two leaflets (6\%) were in the highest quartile of EQIP score for presentation and content. Five leaflets (17\%) had a major inaccuracy such as over-reliance on sun screen products instead of shade and clothing.

Conclusions: leaflets were of variable quality in presentation and content. All required a reading age higher than recommended. All leaflets with major inaccuracies had links with commercial organizations. This study raises important issues about the potential conflict between marketing and health messages in the way sun creams are promoted.
health promotion, patient education, skin neoplasms
0926-9959
566-569
Nicholls, S.
c0fce886-3f58-4c95-b9db-6f2c87ee0f8b
Hankins, Matthew
ce4b7d68-3320-4af4-9dd7-3537a4b07219
Hooley, C.
6e09d282-d080-41bf-86ab-e665930b485d
Smith, H.
cc42a332-71ec-436f-8207-9151275a92d8
Nicholls, S.
c0fce886-3f58-4c95-b9db-6f2c87ee0f8b
Hankins, Matthew
ce4b7d68-3320-4af4-9dd7-3537a4b07219
Hooley, C.
6e09d282-d080-41bf-86ab-e665930b485d
Smith, H.
cc42a332-71ec-436f-8207-9151275a92d8

Nicholls, S., Hankins, Matthew, Hooley, C. and Smith, H. (2009) A survey of the quality and accuracy of information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from UK general practices and community pharmacies. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 23 (5), 566-569. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03017.x). (PMID:19175488)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: better information promotes sun protection behaviour and is associated with earlier presentation and survival for malignant melanoma.

Aim: to assess the quality of patient information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from general practices and community pharmacies.

Design of study: a structured review of patient information leaflets.

Setting: all community pharmacies and general practices in one Primary Care Trust were invited to supply leaflets.

Methods: readability was assessed using the SMOG scoring system. Presentation and content were reviewed using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) guidelines. Three consultant dermatologists assessed each leaflet for accuracy.

Results: thirty-one different patient information leaflets were returned. Thirteen (42\%) were published in the previous 2 years, but 10 (32\%) were over 5 years old. Nine (29\%) leaflets were produced by the NHS or Health Education Authority, and 8 (27\%) were linked to a commercial organization. One leaflet had readability in the primary education range (SMOG score = 6), and none with the recommended range for health education material (SMOG score {$\leq$} 5). Two leaflets (6\%) were in the highest quartile of EQIP score for presentation and content. Five leaflets (17\%) had a major inaccuracy such as over-reliance on sun screen products instead of shade and clothing.

Conclusions: leaflets were of variable quality in presentation and content. All required a reading age higher than recommended. All leaflets with major inaccuracies had links with commercial organizations. This study raises important issues about the potential conflict between marketing and health messages in the way sun creams are promoted.

Text
A_survey_of_the_quality_and_accuracy.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 21 January 2009
Published date: May 2009
Keywords: health promotion, patient education, skin neoplasms

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 187341
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/187341
ISSN: 0926-9959
PURE UUID: 68da22ca-fc10-4b16-b658-25f4c895b22e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 May 2011 08:47
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Nicholls
Author: Matthew Hankins
Author: C. Hooley
Author: H. Smith

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×