The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Problems in extraction and spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll from epilithic microbial biofilms: towards a standard method

Problems in extraction and spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll from epilithic microbial biofilms: towards a standard method
Problems in extraction and spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll from epilithic microbial biofilms: towards a standard method
A variety of methods are available to extract chlorophyll from epilithic biofilms using solvents. The relative efficiency of these has not been determined simultaneously and there is no recognized standard procedure. In this paper techniques for sample collection, storage, preparation and extraction are reviewed and compared experimentally.

Extraction of chlorophyll was incomplete unless biofilms were fully hydrated. This factor was highly significant for all the solvents tested, with at least three times more pigment being extracted from hydrated samples than from dry ones. Methanol was the most efficient solvent, releasing over 96% of the total chlorophyll during a single extraction; hot ethanol extracted 86%, while acetone extracted less than 50%. Sonicating samples during extraction did not release any additional pigment. Centrifuging to remove suspended material did not alter estimates and was not advantageous. Rugose rock surfaces released more chlorophyll than smooth ones. However, a simple method to quantify surface rugosity at an appropriate scale was not available.

Based on these observations, a standard method for chlorophyll extractions from epilithic biofilms using 100% methanol at room temperature (20°C) is proposed. This technique requires considerably less supervision than previously preferred methods and gave a chlorophyll extract which was stable for 15 h.
0025-3154
551-558
Thompson, R.C.
d632e905-6f51-49a0-9426-13c42c3d0a18
Tobin, M.L.
c2a71b79-c7cd-4195-9e4f-1c97328a8925
Hawkins, S.J.
758fe1c1-30cd-4ed1-bb65-2471dc7c11fa
Norton, T.A.
464d9a03-46f4-48ef-9cba-f3662000cbfb
Thompson, R.C.
d632e905-6f51-49a0-9426-13c42c3d0a18
Tobin, M.L.
c2a71b79-c7cd-4195-9e4f-1c97328a8925
Hawkins, S.J.
758fe1c1-30cd-4ed1-bb65-2471dc7c11fa
Norton, T.A.
464d9a03-46f4-48ef-9cba-f3662000cbfb

Thompson, R.C., Tobin, M.L., Hawkins, S.J. and Norton, T.A. (1999) Problems in extraction and spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll from epilithic microbial biofilms: towards a standard method. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 79 (3), 551-558.

Record type: Article

Abstract

A variety of methods are available to extract chlorophyll from epilithic biofilms using solvents. The relative efficiency of these has not been determined simultaneously and there is no recognized standard procedure. In this paper techniques for sample collection, storage, preparation and extraction are reviewed and compared experimentally.

Extraction of chlorophyll was incomplete unless biofilms were fully hydrated. This factor was highly significant for all the solvents tested, with at least three times more pigment being extracted from hydrated samples than from dry ones. Methanol was the most efficient solvent, releasing over 96% of the total chlorophyll during a single extraction; hot ethanol extracted 86%, while acetone extracted less than 50%. Sonicating samples during extraction did not release any additional pigment. Centrifuging to remove suspended material did not alter estimates and was not advantageous. Rugose rock surfaces released more chlorophyll than smooth ones. However, a simple method to quantify surface rugosity at an appropriate scale was not available.

Based on these observations, a standard method for chlorophyll extractions from epilithic biofilms using 100% methanol at room temperature (20°C) is proposed. This technique requires considerably less supervision than previously preferred methods and gave a chlorophyll extract which was stable for 15 h.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1999

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 188723
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/188723
ISSN: 0025-3154
PURE UUID: 1c00bbbc-7c4a-45ab-a050-269ff8322200

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 May 2011 15:42
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 17:33

Export record

Contributors

Author: R.C. Thompson
Author: M.L. Tobin
Author: S.J. Hawkins
Author: T.A. Norton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×