The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

An evaluation of the clinical performance of newly qualified nurses: a competency based assessment

An evaluation of the clinical performance of newly qualified nurses: a competency based assessment
An evaluation of the clinical performance of newly qualified nurses: a competency based assessment
The clinical performance of newly qualified staff nurses, or their 'fitness for purpose' has become a central professional and corporate issue and highlighted as a central causes for the reforms recommended by the Peach report (Peach 1999). However the ability to gauge the performance of newly qualified nurses remains a largely subjective exercise relying upon anecdotal evidence or general statements of newly qualified nurses' feelings of inadequacy on qualification. This article seeks to address this issue by reporting the findings of project that sought to compare the expectations of senior nurses regarding the level of competence of newly qualified nurses with that of the actual level of competency as assessed by the preceptors after 8 weeks in post. Using a specifically designed instrument to assess clinical competency a comparison has been made between 139 senior nurses' expectations of the competency of newly qualified nurses and the actual competence as assessed by preceptors of 36 newly qualified nurses after 8 weeks in post. The findings indicate that the senior nurses have clear subjective expectations of the competence level of newly qualified nurses. However these expectations are consistently lower than the actual level of competency demonstrated by the newly qualified nurses as assessed by their preceptors. This research demonstrates that through the use of a validated tool newly qualified nurses consistently perform at a higher level of competency than that expected by senior nurses. The ability to estimate competency levels by objective means should be developed. Further research is needed involving a larger sample of Trusts and Schools of Nursing to replicate the results of this study and to compare methods of the assessment of performance in terms of competency in practice on qualification. It is through developments based upon research such as this that a systematic evaluation of the contribution of Schools of Nursing to the competence of newly qualified nurses can be addressed.
clinical performance, newly qualified nurses, competency, assessment, evaluation
0260-6917
559-568
O'Connor, S.E.
776e7604-53a5-419e-8b4d-b3048e8dfee7
Pearce, J.
2e64f1c2-a921-4c59-b43c-d89bf20e4d3e
Smith, R.L.
0804ee4c-286d-44a4-90d7-65b9fbec8f18
Voegeli, D.
e6f5d112-55b0-40c1-a6ad-8929a2d84a10
Walton, P.
cc0e8b4a-8e4a-4dfe-b236-4b200fff0e30
O'Connor, S.E.
776e7604-53a5-419e-8b4d-b3048e8dfee7
Pearce, J.
2e64f1c2-a921-4c59-b43c-d89bf20e4d3e
Smith, R.L.
0804ee4c-286d-44a4-90d7-65b9fbec8f18
Voegeli, D.
e6f5d112-55b0-40c1-a6ad-8929a2d84a10
Walton, P.
cc0e8b4a-8e4a-4dfe-b236-4b200fff0e30

O'Connor, S.E., Pearce, J., Smith, R.L., Voegeli, D. and Walton, P. (2001) An evaluation of the clinical performance of newly qualified nurses: a competency based assessment. Nurse Education Today, 21 (7), 559-568. (doi:10.1054/nedt.2001.0594). (PMID:11559010)

Record type: Article

Abstract

The clinical performance of newly qualified staff nurses, or their 'fitness for purpose' has become a central professional and corporate issue and highlighted as a central causes for the reforms recommended by the Peach report (Peach 1999). However the ability to gauge the performance of newly qualified nurses remains a largely subjective exercise relying upon anecdotal evidence or general statements of newly qualified nurses' feelings of inadequacy on qualification. This article seeks to address this issue by reporting the findings of project that sought to compare the expectations of senior nurses regarding the level of competence of newly qualified nurses with that of the actual level of competency as assessed by the preceptors after 8 weeks in post. Using a specifically designed instrument to assess clinical competency a comparison has been made between 139 senior nurses' expectations of the competency of newly qualified nurses and the actual competence as assessed by preceptors of 36 newly qualified nurses after 8 weeks in post. The findings indicate that the senior nurses have clear subjective expectations of the competence level of newly qualified nurses. However these expectations are consistently lower than the actual level of competency demonstrated by the newly qualified nurses as assessed by their preceptors. This research demonstrates that through the use of a validated tool newly qualified nurses consistently perform at a higher level of competency than that expected by senior nurses. The ability to estimate competency levels by objective means should be developed. Further research is needed involving a larger sample of Trusts and Schools of Nursing to replicate the results of this study and to compare methods of the assessment of performance in terms of competency in practice on qualification. It is through developments based upon research such as this that a systematic evaluation of the contribution of Schools of Nursing to the competence of newly qualified nurses can be addressed.

Text
NET_2001.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: October 2001
Keywords: clinical performance, newly qualified nurses, competency, assessment, evaluation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 19089
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/19089
ISSN: 0260-6917
PURE UUID: 5a12c7bd-c47a-4bd9-8a6b-b1bde482bda2
ORCID for D. Voegeli: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3457-7177

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S.E. O'Connor
Author: J. Pearce
Author: R.L. Smith
Author: D. Voegeli ORCID iD
Author: P. Walton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×