The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Narrow primary feather rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx suggest poor flight ability

Narrow primary feather rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx suggest poor flight ability
Narrow primary feather rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx suggest poor flight ability
The fossil birds Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis had feathered wings resembling those of living birds, but their flight capabilities remain uncertain. Analysis of the rachises of their primary feathers shows that the rachises were much thinner and weaker than those of modern birds, and thus the birds were not capable of flight. Only if the primary feather rachises were solid in cross-section (the strongest structural configuration), and not hollow as in living birds, would flight have been possible. Hence, if Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis were flapping flyers, they must have had a feather structure that was fundamentally different from that of living birds. Alternatively, if they were only gliders, then the flapping wing stroke must have appeared after the divergence of Confuciusornis, likely within the enantiornithine or ornithurine radiations.
0036-8075
887-889
Nudds, Robert L.
da7053c3-320b-4189-a228-534b95d80815
Dyke, Gareth J.
600ca61e-b40b-4c86-b8ae-13be4e331e94
Nudds, Robert L.
da7053c3-320b-4189-a228-534b95d80815
Dyke, Gareth J.
600ca61e-b40b-4c86-b8ae-13be4e331e94

Nudds, Robert L. and Dyke, Gareth J. (2010) Narrow primary feather rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx suggest poor flight ability. Science, 328 (5980), 887-889. (doi:10.1126/science.1188895).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The fossil birds Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis had feathered wings resembling those of living birds, but their flight capabilities remain uncertain. Analysis of the rachises of their primary feathers shows that the rachises were much thinner and weaker than those of modern birds, and thus the birds were not capable of flight. Only if the primary feather rachises were solid in cross-section (the strongest structural configuration), and not hollow as in living birds, would flight have been possible. Hence, if Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis were flapping flyers, they must have had a feather structure that was fundamentally different from that of living birds. Alternatively, if they were only gliders, then the flapping wing stroke must have appeared after the divergence of Confuciusornis, likely within the enantiornithine or ornithurine radiations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 14 May 2010
Organisations: Ocean Biochemistry & Ecosystems

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 201173
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/201173
ISSN: 0036-8075
PURE UUID: 331ef0cb-c192-428f-a9e0-fad44f08d740

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Oct 2011 09:51
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Robert L. Nudds
Author: Gareth J. Dyke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×