The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Should search engines begin to worry?

Should search engines begin to worry?
Should search engines begin to worry?
Since its creation in 2000, the advertising service run by the search engine Google, known under the name of Adwords, has fed the case law of several legal systems. One of the main issues is how “google’s law” interacts with national trademark laws. This issue is all the more crucial because national trademark laws are one of the few components of the legal net in which “intermediary Internet service providers” act within cyberspace. Besides, Google is not a second-rate online intermediary. “Google’s control over search results constitutes an awesome ability to set the course of human knowledge.” At the same time, other search engines use similar programs for advertising purposes. This paper thus seeks to determine and analyze the components of the legal framework confining the powers of search engines running advertising services and thereby to underline the ambiguities of search engines’ liability regimes as they derive from national case law
1094-2904
3-9
Stalla-Bourdillon, Sophie
c189651b-9ed3-49f6-bf37-25a47c487164
Stalla-Bourdillon, Sophie
c189651b-9ed3-49f6-bf37-25a47c487164

Stalla-Bourdillon, Sophie (2010) Should search engines begin to worry? Journal of Internet Law, 14, 3-9.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Since its creation in 2000, the advertising service run by the search engine Google, known under the name of Adwords, has fed the case law of several legal systems. One of the main issues is how “google’s law” interacts with national trademark laws. This issue is all the more crucial because national trademark laws are one of the few components of the legal net in which “intermediary Internet service providers” act within cyberspace. Besides, Google is not a second-rate online intermediary. “Google’s control over search results constitutes an awesome ability to set the course of human knowledge.” At the same time, other search engines use similar programs for advertising purposes. This paper thus seeks to determine and analyze the components of the legal framework confining the powers of search engines running advertising services and thereby to underline the ambiguities of search engines’ liability regimes as they derive from national case law

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2010
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 201449
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/201449
ISSN: 1094-2904
PURE UUID: f282ed1e-d102-4774-956c-4001dd5c43e1
ORCID for Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-1219

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Oct 2011 14:43
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 04:30

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×