The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Sociodemographic differences in diabetic retinopathy screening; using patient-level primary care data for health equity audit

Sociodemographic differences in diabetic retinopathy screening; using patient-level primary care data for health equity audit
Sociodemographic differences in diabetic retinopathy screening; using patient-level primary care data for health equity audit
Background: the prevalence of diabetes is increasing worldwide and there is inequality in the distribution of diabetic complications. Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in adults of working age in the UK, and certain risk factors are recognized. Retinopathy screening in the UK involves annual digital retinal photography and image grading. Auditing equity in retinopathy screening poses unique challenges, and screening program data are often incomplete for variables relevant to equity. Using two sources of patient-level primary care data, we conducted a health equity audit comparing the access and uptake of screening between groups of people with diabetes in each of three screening programs covering this area of southern England.

Methods: a patient-level dataset using data from general practices and a combined health record was used to compare dimensions of equity (gender, age, length of time since diabetes diagnosis, type of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity, and screening program) between people with and without a record of retinopathy screening within three years in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, UK.

Results: anonymized data for 70,004 people with diabetes were obtained from 205 (88%) general practices. In total, 62,836 people (89.8%) had a record of screening within three years and 7168 (10.2%) did not. Lower uptake of screening was independently associated with the youngest and oldest age groups (compared with 50–79-year-olds), recent diabetes diagnosis, and deprived areas. Diagnosed hypertension was positively associated with screening.

Conclusion: evaluating equity in screening programs is important to help reduce inequalities. We found evidence of inequity in access and uptake of retinopathy screening. Primary care data contained more information than screening program data. Using a combined health record was more efficient than obtaining data directly from general practices, but data were incomplete for deprivation measures at the time of this audit. Our audit informed subsequent efforts to improve equity in local diabetic retinopathy screening services
1179-2760
7-15
Fraser, Simon D.S.
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Watkinson, G.E.
5388bae3-0e70-4cc3-bfc2-4dd86964710c
Rennie, C.A.
774e5501-a414-47b8-a036-ee3adb226fc2
King, D.
ed13b6a5-ff3e-49d4-9270-e12e824da3ce
Sanderson, H.
356447ec-25d8-4456-975f-35d4d7d1e412
Edwards, L.
8abc28c8-6723-42e9-8252-f96ad472765d
Roderick, P.
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a
Fraser, Simon D.S.
135884b6-8737-4e8a-a98c-5d803ac7a2dc
Watkinson, G.E.
5388bae3-0e70-4cc3-bfc2-4dd86964710c
Rennie, C.A.
774e5501-a414-47b8-a036-ee3adb226fc2
King, D.
ed13b6a5-ff3e-49d4-9270-e12e824da3ce
Sanderson, H.
356447ec-25d8-4456-975f-35d4d7d1e412
Edwards, L.
8abc28c8-6723-42e9-8252-f96ad472765d
Roderick, P.
dbb3cd11-4c51-4844-982b-0eb30ad5085a

Fraser, Simon D.S., Watkinson, G.E., Rennie, C.A., King, D., Sanderson, H., Edwards, L. and Roderick, P. (2011) Sociodemographic differences in diabetic retinopathy screening; using patient-level primary care data for health equity audit. Clinical Audit, 3, 7-15. (doi:10.2147/CA.S25313).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the prevalence of diabetes is increasing worldwide and there is inequality in the distribution of diabetic complications. Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in adults of working age in the UK, and certain risk factors are recognized. Retinopathy screening in the UK involves annual digital retinal photography and image grading. Auditing equity in retinopathy screening poses unique challenges, and screening program data are often incomplete for variables relevant to equity. Using two sources of patient-level primary care data, we conducted a health equity audit comparing the access and uptake of screening between groups of people with diabetes in each of three screening programs covering this area of southern England.

Methods: a patient-level dataset using data from general practices and a combined health record was used to compare dimensions of equity (gender, age, length of time since diabetes diagnosis, type of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity, and screening program) between people with and without a record of retinopathy screening within three years in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, UK.

Results: anonymized data for 70,004 people with diabetes were obtained from 205 (88%) general practices. In total, 62,836 people (89.8%) had a record of screening within three years and 7168 (10.2%) did not. Lower uptake of screening was independently associated with the youngest and oldest age groups (compared with 50–79-year-olds), recent diabetes diagnosis, and deprived areas. Diagnosed hypertension was positively associated with screening.

Conclusion: evaluating equity in screening programs is important to help reduce inequalities. We found evidence of inequity in access and uptake of retinopathy screening. Primary care data contained more information than screening program data. Using a combined health record was more efficient than obtaining data directly from general practices, but data were incomplete for deprivation measures at the time of this audit. Our audit informed subsequent efforts to improve equity in local diabetic retinopathy screening services

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: November 2011
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences, Primary Care & Population Sciences, Medical Education

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 202977
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/202977
ISSN: 1179-2760
PURE UUID: d0552e52-8728-42ab-ac7c-c80915797ea9
ORCID for Simon D.S. Fraser: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4172-4406
ORCID for P. Roderick: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-6850

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Nov 2011 12:33
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G.E. Watkinson
Author: C.A. Rennie
Author: D. King
Author: H. Sanderson
Author: L. Edwards
Author: P. Roderick ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×