The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reflections on the nature of 'public ethics'

Reflections on the nature of 'public ethics'
Reflections on the nature of 'public ethics'
This paper reflects on the processes by which the Organ Donation Taskforce reached its conclusion not to propose a 'presumed consent' model for organ donation, drawing on the author’s experience as a member of that Taskforce and of other bodies charged with exploring ‘public ethics’. It argues that 'public' ethics is a much more contingent process than academic work and needs to (a) take into account contemporary policy debates, (b) be expressed in terms that are sufficiently close to the prevailing professional discourse to have a reasonable hope of reception, (c) assess how positions will be represented in the media and what behavioural changes will follow in the actual political context, (d) create workable compromise formulations, from which people can reason even if they reach them by different arguments. Critiques of ‘public ethics’ need to take these features into account. Greater attention must also be paid to the difficulties for ‘public ethics’ of dealing with public opinion and also to the implications of these contextual contingencies for analysis based on comparative work (both over time and between countries). Criticism needs also to be sensitive to the fact that pronouncements on ‘public ethics’ are an exercise in persuasion whose audience is not academics. This may excuse the use of familiar but imperfect paradigms for analysis and a degree of compromise between committee members. It does not justify incoherent arguments
0963-1801
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04

Montgomery, Jonathan (2011) Reflections on the nature of 'public ethics'. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper reflects on the processes by which the Organ Donation Taskforce reached its conclusion not to propose a 'presumed consent' model for organ donation, drawing on the author’s experience as a member of that Taskforce and of other bodies charged with exploring ‘public ethics’. It argues that 'public' ethics is a much more contingent process than academic work and needs to (a) take into account contemporary policy debates, (b) be expressed in terms that are sufficiently close to the prevailing professional discourse to have a reasonable hope of reception, (c) assess how positions will be represented in the media and what behavioural changes will follow in the actual political context, (d) create workable compromise formulations, from which people can reason even if they reach them by different arguments. Critiques of ‘public ethics’ need to take these features into account. Greater attention must also be paid to the difficulties for ‘public ethics’ of dealing with public opinion and also to the implications of these contextual contingencies for analysis based on comparative work (both over time and between countries). Criticism needs also to be sensitive to the fact that pronouncements on ‘public ethics’ are an exercise in persuasion whose audience is not academics. This may excuse the use of familiar but imperfect paradigms for analysis and a degree of compromise between committee members. It does not justify incoherent arguments

Text
The_Nature_of_'Public'_Ethics_cut_down_final_post_review.doc - Author's Original
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2011
Organisations: Southampton Law School

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 204681
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/204681
ISSN: 0963-1801
PURE UUID: 30cb87c1-95ba-413f-b1f3-428f12e7f31d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Dec 2011 13:18
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 04:32

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jonathan Montgomery

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×