Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe

Ciscar, Juan-Carlos, Iglesias, Ana, Feyen, Luc, Szabó, László, Van Regemorter, Denise, Amelunge, Bas, Nicholls, Robert J., Watkiss, Paul, Christensen, Ole B., Dankers, Rutger, Garrote, Luis, Goodess, Clare M., Hunt, Alistair, Moreno, Alvaro, Richards, Julie and Soria , Antonio (2011) Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, (7)(doi:10.1073/pnas.1011612108)

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Description/Abstract

Quantitative estimates of the economic damages of climate change usually are based on aggregate relationships linking average temperature change to loss in gross domestic product (GDP). However, there is a clear need for further detail in the regional and sectoral dimensions of impact assessments to design and prioritize adaptation strategies. New developments in regional climate modeling and physical-impact modeling in Europe allow a better exploration of those dimensions. This article quantifies the potential consequences of climate change in Europe in four market impact categories (agriculture, river floods, coastal areas, and tourism) and one nonmarket impact (human health). The methodology integrates a set of coherent, high-resolution climate change projections and physical models into an economic modeling framework. We find that if the climate of the 2080s were to occur today, the annual loss in household welfare in the European Union (EU) resulting from the four market impacts would range between 0.2–1%. If the welfare loss is assumed to be constant over time, climate change may halve the EU's annual welfare growth. Scenarios with warmer temperatures and a higher rise in sea level result in more severe economic damage. However, the results show that there are large variations across European regions. Southern Europe, the British Isles, and Central Europe North appear most sensitive to climate change. Northern Europe, on the other hand, is the only region with net economic benefits, driven mainly by the positive effects on agriculture. Coastal systems, agriculture, and river flooding are the most important of the four market impacts assessed

Item Type:Article
ISSN:0027-8424 (print)
1091-6490 (electronic)
Subjects:G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Divisions:Faculty of Engineering and the Environment > Civil, Maritime and Environmental Engineering and Science > Energy & Climate Change Group
ePrint ID:207337
URI:http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/207337
Deposited On:12 Jan 2012 14:05
Last Modified:02 Mar 2012 13:40

Associated Staff Only: edit my ePrint