The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The biological validation of ADCP acoustic backscatter through direct comparison with net samples and model predictions based on acoustic-scattering models

The biological validation of ADCP acoustic backscatter through direct comparison with net samples and model predictions based on acoustic-scattering models
The biological validation of ADCP acoustic backscatter through direct comparison with net samples and model predictions based on acoustic-scattering models
Mean volume-backscattering strength (MVBS) data collected using a 153-kHz, narrowband Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) were compared with zooplankton abundance and biovolume data collected using a Longhurst–Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR). A direct comparison showed that there was a linear relationship between MVBS and log-transformed zooplankton dry weight. This linear relationship, determined from a mixed zooplankton-species population, was then compared with that reported in previous work from a region dominated by a single species of copepod and found to be significantly different. The scatter around the linear relationships determined between MVBS and log-transformed dry weights in regions of complex, mixed zooplankton populations results in our inability to distinguish different relationships that could be expected from different populations in varying oceanic regions. It is suggested that, without further manipulation of the data, ADCP MVBS cannot be used to determine quantitative estimates of zooplankton abundance and biomass in mixed populations.
"Observed MVBS" was compared with model-predicted backscattering, calculated using acoustic models and abundance and size measurements of zooplankton from net samples. The results show that at high backscattering intensities (>?80 dB) the observed MVBS from an ADCP was generally consistent with the model predictions. Abundance, biovolume, and model-predicted backscattering contributions of six "significant acoustic-scattering" groups (amphipods, chaetognaths, copepods, euphausiids, fish, and pteropods) are shown to vary disproportionately. In particular, a rare and small but strong acoustic scatterer such as a pteropod can contribute as little as 0.1% to the total sample abundance and 0.1% to the biovolume but represent 69.5% of the total model-predicted backscattering.
Model, instrumental, and methodological artefacts are identified as potential sources of inconsistencies between the observed and model-predicted backscattering. These include the effect of the orientation of zooplankton, inadequate knowledge of model parameters such as the sound-speed and density contrasts, the mismatch between sampling volumes of the net and acoustic instrument, and net avoidance by the more mobile scatterers.
acoustic models, arabian sea, bioacoustics, doppler sonar, mvbs, northwest indian ocean, sound scattering, zooplankton
1054-3139
184-200
Fielding, S.
6fcd5a6f-5526-490c-a34f-506174caa3f8
Griffiths, G.
2887c3c7-95f2-4834-b3f6-0284344d3580
Roe, H.S.J.
c20f0cc4-fd68-4640-a80e-8405a22fa537
Fielding, S.
6fcd5a6f-5526-490c-a34f-506174caa3f8
Griffiths, G.
2887c3c7-95f2-4834-b3f6-0284344d3580
Roe, H.S.J.
c20f0cc4-fd68-4640-a80e-8405a22fa537

Fielding, S., Griffiths, G. and Roe, H.S.J. (2004) The biological validation of ADCP acoustic backscatter through direct comparison with net samples and model predictions based on acoustic-scattering models. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61 (2), 184-200. (doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.011).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Mean volume-backscattering strength (MVBS) data collected using a 153-kHz, narrowband Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) were compared with zooplankton abundance and biovolume data collected using a Longhurst–Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR). A direct comparison showed that there was a linear relationship between MVBS and log-transformed zooplankton dry weight. This linear relationship, determined from a mixed zooplankton-species population, was then compared with that reported in previous work from a region dominated by a single species of copepod and found to be significantly different. The scatter around the linear relationships determined between MVBS and log-transformed dry weights in regions of complex, mixed zooplankton populations results in our inability to distinguish different relationships that could be expected from different populations in varying oceanic regions. It is suggested that, without further manipulation of the data, ADCP MVBS cannot be used to determine quantitative estimates of zooplankton abundance and biomass in mixed populations.
"Observed MVBS" was compared with model-predicted backscattering, calculated using acoustic models and abundance and size measurements of zooplankton from net samples. The results show that at high backscattering intensities (>?80 dB) the observed MVBS from an ADCP was generally consistent with the model predictions. Abundance, biovolume, and model-predicted backscattering contributions of six "significant acoustic-scattering" groups (amphipods, chaetognaths, copepods, euphausiids, fish, and pteropods) are shown to vary disproportionately. In particular, a rare and small but strong acoustic scatterer such as a pteropod can contribute as little as 0.1% to the total sample abundance and 0.1% to the biovolume but represent 69.5% of the total model-predicted backscattering.
Model, instrumental, and methodological artefacts are identified as potential sources of inconsistencies between the observed and model-predicted backscattering. These include the effect of the orientation of zooplankton, inadequate knowledge of model parameters such as the sound-speed and density contrasts, the mismatch between sampling volumes of the net and acoustic instrument, and net avoidance by the more mobile scatterers.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: acoustic models, arabian sea, bioacoustics, doppler sonar, mvbs, northwest indian ocean, sound scattering, zooplankton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 22708
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/22708
ISSN: 1054-3139
PURE UUID: 9c4fa652-bd0f-435c-983d-4d3162d78747

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Fielding
Author: G. Griffiths
Author: H.S.J. Roe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×