Comparative study of projection schemes for stochastic finite element analysis


Sachdeva, Sachin K., Nair, Prasanth B. and Keane, Andy J. (2006) Comparative study of projection schemes for stochastic finite element analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195, (19-22), 2371-2392. (doi:10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.010).

Download

[img]
Preview
PDF - Post print
Download (3487Kb)

Description/Abstract

We present a comparison of subspace projection schemes for stochastic finite element analysis in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. More specifically, we compare the polynomial chaos projection scheme with reduced basis projection schemes based on the preconditioned stochastic Krylov subspace. Numerical studies are presented for two problems: (1) static analysis of a plate with random Young’s modulus and (2) settlement of a foundation supported on a randomly heterogeneous soil. Monte Carlo simulation results based on exact structural analysis are used to generate benchmark results against which the projection schemes are compared. We show that stochastic reduced basis methods require significantly less computer memory and execution time compared to the polynomial chaos approach, particularly for large-scale problems with many random variables. For the class of problems considered, we find that stochastic reduced basis methods can be up to orders of magnitude faster, while providing results of comparable or better accuracy.

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 0045-7825 (print)
Related URLs:
Keywords: stochastic finite element analysis, projection schemes, polynomial chaos, stochastic reduced basis methods
Subjects: T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Divisions: University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Engineering Sciences
ePrint ID: 23315
Date Deposited: 15 Mar 2006
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2014 18:12
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/23315

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics