An exploratory qualitative study to investigate how patients evaluate complementary and conventional medicine


Lewith, G.T. and Chan, J. (2002) An exploratory qualitative study to investigate how patients evaluate complementary and conventional medicine. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 10, (2), 69-77. (doi:10.1054/ctim.2002.0524).

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

Original Publication URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/ctim.2002.0524

Description/Abstract

Objective: we wish to determine the constructs used by patients to evaluate conventional and complementary medicine (CAM), prioritise these constructs and determine how these characterise patients‘ choice for CAM and conventional medicine.

Methods: a repertory grid technique was employed, in interviews of 20 patients, 10 from a general practice and 10 from a CAM clinic.

Results: CAM was used with greater frequency in chronic illness and generated more constructs than conventional medicine, although the constructs were similar. The priorities for these constructs were different: specificity of treatment and severity of illness were prioritised for conventional medicine and lack of science was prioritised for CAM. The CAM characteristic most commonly cited was non-chemical.

Conclusion: this exploratory initial study suggests that people use very similar criteria to evaluate CAM and conventional medicine. Their choice of treatment was based largely on the type of illness from which they were suffering. Further research is needed in this area.

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 0965-2299 (print)
Related URLs:
Subjects: R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine
Divisions: University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Medicine > Community Clinical Sciences
ePrint ID: 24374
Date Deposited: 30 Mar 2006
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2014 18:13
Contact Email Address: gl3@soton.ac.uk
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24374

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item