Presentiment or entanglement? An alternative explanation for apparent entanglement in provings
Lewith, G.T., Brien, Sarah and Hyland, Michael E. (2005) Presentiment or entanglement? An alternative explanation for apparent entanglement in provings. Homeopathy, 94, (2), 92 -95. (doi:10.1016/j.homp.2005.02.005).
Full text not available from this repository.
A number of authors have recently discussed the possible role entanglement in homeopathy. Walach et al have published a homeopathic proving which they interpreted as demonstrating entanglement between placebo and verum groups in a proving. The lack of a ‘run-in’ period was a weakness of this trial.
We present further results of our proving of Belladonna which show that subjects who reported symptoms during the placebo run-in period (‘presentiment provers’) were more likely to report symptoms during the treatment period. This data suggests and the observations of Walach et al may be explicable by conventional mechanisms including differential reporting and constitutional type
|Keywords:||proving, entanglement, presentiment privers, belladonna|
|Subjects:||R Medicine > RX Homeopathy|
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Medicine > Community Clinical Sciences
|Date Deposited:||29 Mar 2006|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2012 13:05|
|Contributors:||Lewith, G.T. (Author)
Brien, Sarah (Author)
Hyland, Michael E. (Author)
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)