Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?


Harnad, Stevan (2001) Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? In, Bishop, M. and Preston, J. (eds.) UNSPECIFIED Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument , Oxford University Press.

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.

Download

[img] HTML
Download (35Kb)

Description/Abstract

Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).

Item Type: Book Section
Additional Information: Address: Oxford
Divisions: Faculty of Physical and Applied Science > Electronics and Computer Science > Web & Internet Science
Item ID: 255942
Date Deposited: 21 Jun 2001
Last Modified: 02 Mar 2012 12:19
Contributors: Harnad, Stevan (Author)
Bishop, M. (Editor)
Preston, J. (Editor)
Date: 2001
Additional Information: Address: Oxford
Status: Published
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/255942

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
EPrints Logo
Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk
ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2