Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?
Bishop, M. and Preston, J. (eds.)
Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument
Oxford University Press.
Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).
Available Versions of this Item
Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? (deposited 21 Jun 2001)
Actions (login required)