The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community

The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community
The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community
Objectives. The aim of the survey was to assess the prevalence of clinically diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (OA) in two general practice populations in the Wessex region (practice A: a deprived urban population and practice B: an affluent rural population) and to assess both conventional and complementary therapy use in these two populations.
Methods. All patients over 55 yr with a clinical diagnosis of knee OA, as identified from the practice computerized records, were sent a questionnaire about their knee pain and their use of conventional and complementary treatments.
Results. A total of 4566 patients over 55 yr were registered in the two practices. Of these, 828 (18.13%) had a clinical diagnosis of knee OA and 240 (29%) patients were asymptomatic at the time of survey. Physiotherapy was under-utilized with only 13.1% of patients having received either hospital- or GP-based physiotherapy. There was a high prevalence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, being significantly more in the affluent population (P < 0.05). In the affluent population there were statistically more social class groups 1–3a; statistically more NSAIDs, glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate were also used. The median amount spent on complementary medicine per month was £5.00, with the affluent population spending significantly more (P < 0.05).
Conclusions. In this population, physiotherapy is an under-utilized treatment for knee OA, in spite of its recommendation as first-line treatment in all guidelines. Complementary medicines and therapies are commonly used, particularly in affluent populations.
complementary medicine, glucosamine sulphate, knee joint, osteoarthritis, physiotherapy, nsaids
1462-0324
381-384
Jordan, K. M.
6d75b3f7-e6fb-4dd5-92cf-44d82659bb19
Sawyer, S.
b70674f7-f600-4e3a-88fd-bfa19678c399
Coakley, P.
6d68ba63-ddf6-499c-9507-9106618f0a47
Smith, H. E.
e9c5a449-96d9-4c29-9921-321ce9e28049
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Arden, N. K.
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f
Jordan, K. M.
6d75b3f7-e6fb-4dd5-92cf-44d82659bb19
Sawyer, S.
b70674f7-f600-4e3a-88fd-bfa19678c399
Coakley, P.
6d68ba63-ddf6-499c-9507-9106618f0a47
Smith, H. E.
e9c5a449-96d9-4c29-9921-321ce9e28049
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Arden, N. K.
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f

Jordan, K. M., Sawyer, S., Coakley, P., Smith, H. E., Cooper, C. and Arden, N. K. (2004) The use of conventional and complementary treatments for knee osteoarthritis in the community. Rheumatology, 43 (3), 381-384. (doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh045).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of the survey was to assess the prevalence of clinically diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (OA) in two general practice populations in the Wessex region (practice A: a deprived urban population and practice B: an affluent rural population) and to assess both conventional and complementary therapy use in these two populations.
Methods. All patients over 55 yr with a clinical diagnosis of knee OA, as identified from the practice computerized records, were sent a questionnaire about their knee pain and their use of conventional and complementary treatments.
Results. A total of 4566 patients over 55 yr were registered in the two practices. Of these, 828 (18.13%) had a clinical diagnosis of knee OA and 240 (29%) patients were asymptomatic at the time of survey. Physiotherapy was under-utilized with only 13.1% of patients having received either hospital- or GP-based physiotherapy. There was a high prevalence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, being significantly more in the affluent population (P < 0.05). In the affluent population there were statistically more social class groups 1–3a; statistically more NSAIDs, glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate were also used. The median amount spent on complementary medicine per month was £5.00, with the affluent population spending significantly more (P < 0.05).
Conclusions. In this population, physiotherapy is an under-utilized treatment for knee OA, in spite of its recommendation as first-line treatment in all guidelines. Complementary medicines and therapies are commonly used, particularly in affluent populations.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2004
Keywords: complementary medicine, glucosamine sulphate, knee joint, osteoarthritis, physiotherapy, nsaids

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 25680
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/25680
ISSN: 1462-0324
PURE UUID: ae3eb3b6-589a-44e1-a93e-4bdb8e39731a
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Apr 2006
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K. M. Jordan
Author: S. Sawyer
Author: P. Coakley
Author: H. E. Smith
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: N. K. Arden

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×