The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evidence-based nutrition - review of epidemiological studies

Evidence-based nutrition - review of epidemiological studies
Evidence-based nutrition - review of epidemiological studies
Results from epidemiological studies are often used to explore the relationships between nutrition and health. The objective of this paper is to provide guidelines for evaluating the quality and strength of evidence from different types of epidemiological studies (including ecological, cross-sectional, case-control, cohort and experimental studies) for conclusions about the relationship between nutrition and health.
The discussion include advantages and disadvantages of these different types of studies, exposures, outcomes, the role of chance, bias and confounding factors, recruitment and sampling procedures and criteria, study size and power, measurement error (random and systematic), time effects, observer and participant effects, compliance, as well as analysis and interpretation of results. A checklist for reviewing epidemiological studies is given as guide to assess the quality of the data and the suitability of the study results for specific conclusions.
68-73
Margetts, B.M.
d415f4a1-d572-4ebc-be25-f54886cb4788
Vorster, H.H.
b7c5726d-3d17-4fdf-a71e-06139e0bd77b
Venter, C.S.
a8231444-5116-4c77-9532-d190b89f38e0
Margetts, B.M.
d415f4a1-d572-4ebc-be25-f54886cb4788
Vorster, H.H.
b7c5726d-3d17-4fdf-a71e-06139e0bd77b
Venter, C.S.
a8231444-5116-4c77-9532-d190b89f38e0

Margetts, B.M., Vorster, H.H. and Venter, C.S. (2002) Evidence-based nutrition - review of epidemiological studies. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 15 (3), 68-73.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Results from epidemiological studies are often used to explore the relationships between nutrition and health. The objective of this paper is to provide guidelines for evaluating the quality and strength of evidence from different types of epidemiological studies (including ecological, cross-sectional, case-control, cohort and experimental studies) for conclusions about the relationship between nutrition and health.
The discussion include advantages and disadvantages of these different types of studies, exposures, outcomes, the role of chance, bias and confounding factors, recruitment and sampling procedures and criteria, study size and power, measurement error (random and systematic), time effects, observer and participant effects, compliance, as well as analysis and interpretation of results. A checklist for reviewing epidemiological studies is given as guide to assess the quality of the data and the suitability of the study results for specific conclusions.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002
Additional Information: Review Article

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 25782
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/25782
PURE UUID: a8904ddf-f738-4ab9-a9e4-34df1ac37010

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2006
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 14:57

Export record

Contributors

Author: B.M. Margetts
Author: H.H. Vorster
Author: C.S. Venter

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×