The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study

Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study
Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study
Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability. There are, however, few prospective data looking at back pain and disability following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of radiographically identified vertebral fracture on the subsequent occurrence of back pain and disability. Women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 18 European centers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions about back pain in the past year and various activities of daily living, and they had lateral spine radiographs performed. Participants in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spine radiographs performed a mean of 3.7 years later. In addition they completed a questionnaire with the same baseline questions concerning back pain and activities of daily living. The presence of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture was defined using established morphometric criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with back pain or disability (present or absent) at follow-up as the outcome variable with adjustment made for the baseline value of the variable. The study included 2,260 women, mean age 62.2 years. The mean time between baseline and follow-up survey was 5.0 years. Two hundred and forty participants had prevalent fractures at the baseline survey, and 85 developed incident fractures during follow-up. After adjustment for age, center, and the baseline level of disability, compared with those without baseline prevalent fracture, those with a prevalent fracture (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.0) or an incident fracture (OR=1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2) were more likely to report disability at follow-up, though the confidence intervals embraced unity. Those with both a prevalent and incident fracture, however, were significantly more likely to report disability at follow-up (OR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.0). After adjustment for age, center, and frequency of back pain at baseline, compared with those without baseline vertebral fracture, those with a prevalent fracture were no more likely to report back pain at follow-up (OR=1.2; 95%CI, 0.8 to 1.7). There was a small increased risk among those with a preexisting fracture who had sustained an incident fracture during follow-up (OR=1.6; 95%CI, 0.6 to 4.1) though the confidence intervals embraced unity. In conclusion, although there was no significant increase in the level of back pain an average of 5 years following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture, women who suffered a further fracture during follow-up experienced substantial levels of disability with impairment in key physical functions of independent living.
back pain, disability, prospective study, vertebral fracture
0937-941X
760-765
O'Neill, T.W.
688d84bf-f76f-4777-a3e1-65c6e5526365
Cockerill, W.
cd79b232-2a11-45d9-96ca-650f0c33d10a
Matthis, C.
c9fee9d4-0238-4a46-a802-50bc3e4d52c9
Raspe, H.H.
bbc07073-9a00-4437-b5e5-a069915164dc
Lunt, M.
c2b3288c-62f9-4a6c-aca5-ad0c1cc76ce5
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Banzer, D.
e89f28eb-08ef-4c44-a279-ebd3716de522
Cannata, J.B.
5533a72c-dabd-4545-993b-7dc4619dda2c
Naves, M.
5fbfd919-9393-4061-9bda-d63cb73b688d
Felsch, B.
ccd4959a-803f-4fc9-895d-c287426e02f0
Felsenberg, D.
a8f19c6b-0781-4071-bfce-442eaa59e9bf
Janott, J.
992f2227-2fa2-4330-9011-8c2620b793a0
Johnell, O.
633a35fb-6cd3-4df2-af7f-36303f64cf7a
Kanis, J.A.
8da04a36-08a7-4310-b4b4-a6d432439587
Kragl, G.
80efbbb1-ea92-4e75-9da4-b97bde3db818
Lopes Vaz, A.
0c986c37-ba2a-4f49-b020-f09dbf1ff408
Lyritis, G.
4fa5b700-a006-4e8c-9e7a-9e8e95256de3
Masaryk, P.
9e142225-c883-4e7c-860b-1636f3051068
Poor, G.
71ab6355-df37-4e3b-955e-856f3b979b40
Reid, D.M.
80c8f859-f13a-4129-b884-c0fbc46d61b8
Reisinger, W.
9a777d94-590d-4fca-95ce-7410aaffc917
Scheidt-Nave, C.
0bcffa8d-9cd7-4b6a-adb5-f8123e01e9a8
Stepan, J.J.
4db04e6d-013d-4700-89ba-d5b9048366e6
Todd, C.J.
2902b0b2-53f4-4f8b-a183-3293397a7386
Woolf, A.D.
7c05adbb-8e8c-49fa-9d03-e6f6e14fe720
Reeve, J.
8f5bc093-0e10-42ca-8d4a-07c1eaace565
Silman, A.J.
9d44d748-a9d2-447e-87dd-6dfa3d4eb1ac
O'Neill, T.W.
688d84bf-f76f-4777-a3e1-65c6e5526365
Cockerill, W.
cd79b232-2a11-45d9-96ca-650f0c33d10a
Matthis, C.
c9fee9d4-0238-4a46-a802-50bc3e4d52c9
Raspe, H.H.
bbc07073-9a00-4437-b5e5-a069915164dc
Lunt, M.
c2b3288c-62f9-4a6c-aca5-ad0c1cc76ce5
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Banzer, D.
e89f28eb-08ef-4c44-a279-ebd3716de522
Cannata, J.B.
5533a72c-dabd-4545-993b-7dc4619dda2c
Naves, M.
5fbfd919-9393-4061-9bda-d63cb73b688d
Felsch, B.
ccd4959a-803f-4fc9-895d-c287426e02f0
Felsenberg, D.
a8f19c6b-0781-4071-bfce-442eaa59e9bf
Janott, J.
992f2227-2fa2-4330-9011-8c2620b793a0
Johnell, O.
633a35fb-6cd3-4df2-af7f-36303f64cf7a
Kanis, J.A.
8da04a36-08a7-4310-b4b4-a6d432439587
Kragl, G.
80efbbb1-ea92-4e75-9da4-b97bde3db818
Lopes Vaz, A.
0c986c37-ba2a-4f49-b020-f09dbf1ff408
Lyritis, G.
4fa5b700-a006-4e8c-9e7a-9e8e95256de3
Masaryk, P.
9e142225-c883-4e7c-860b-1636f3051068
Poor, G.
71ab6355-df37-4e3b-955e-856f3b979b40
Reid, D.M.
80c8f859-f13a-4129-b884-c0fbc46d61b8
Reisinger, W.
9a777d94-590d-4fca-95ce-7410aaffc917
Scheidt-Nave, C.
0bcffa8d-9cd7-4b6a-adb5-f8123e01e9a8
Stepan, J.J.
4db04e6d-013d-4700-89ba-d5b9048366e6
Todd, C.J.
2902b0b2-53f4-4f8b-a183-3293397a7386
Woolf, A.D.
7c05adbb-8e8c-49fa-9d03-e6f6e14fe720
Reeve, J.
8f5bc093-0e10-42ca-8d4a-07c1eaace565
Silman, A.J.
9d44d748-a9d2-447e-87dd-6dfa3d4eb1ac

O'Neill, T.W., Cockerill, W., Matthis, C., Raspe, H.H., Lunt, M., Cooper, C., Banzer, D., Cannata, J.B., Naves, M., Felsch, B., Felsenberg, D., Janott, J., Johnell, O., Kanis, J.A., Kragl, G., Lopes Vaz, A., Lyritis, G., Masaryk, P., Poor, G., Reid, D.M., Reisinger, W., Scheidt-Nave, C., Stepan, J.J., Todd, C.J., Woolf, A.D., Reeve, J. and Silman, A.J. (2004) Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporosis International, 15 (9), 760-765. (doi:10.1007/s00198-004-1615-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are associated with back pain and disability. There are, however, few prospective data looking at back pain and disability following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture. The aim of this analysis was to determine the impact of radiographically identified vertebral fracture on the subsequent occurrence of back pain and disability. Women aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 18 European centers for participation in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire which included questions about back pain in the past year and various activities of daily living, and they had lateral spine radiographs performed. Participants in these centers were followed prospectively and had repeat spine radiographs performed a mean of 3.7 years later. In addition they completed a questionnaire with the same baseline questions concerning back pain and activities of daily living. The presence of prevalent and incident vertebral fracture was defined using established morphometric criteria. The data were analyzed using logistic regression with back pain or disability (present or absent) at follow-up as the outcome variable with adjustment made for the baseline value of the variable. The study included 2,260 women, mean age 62.2 years. The mean time between baseline and follow-up survey was 5.0 years. Two hundred and forty participants had prevalent fractures at the baseline survey, and 85 developed incident fractures during follow-up. After adjustment for age, center, and the baseline level of disability, compared with those without baseline prevalent fracture, those with a prevalent fracture (odds ratio [OR]=1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 2.0) or an incident fracture (OR=1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2) were more likely to report disability at follow-up, though the confidence intervals embraced unity. Those with both a prevalent and incident fracture, however, were significantly more likely to report disability at follow-up (OR=3.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.0). After adjustment for age, center, and frequency of back pain at baseline, compared with those without baseline vertebral fracture, those with a prevalent fracture were no more likely to report back pain at follow-up (OR=1.2; 95%CI, 0.8 to 1.7). There was a small increased risk among those with a preexisting fracture who had sustained an incident fracture during follow-up (OR=1.6; 95%CI, 0.6 to 4.1) though the confidence intervals embraced unity. In conclusion, although there was no significant increase in the level of back pain an average of 5 years following identification of radiographic vertebral fracture, women who suffered a further fracture during follow-up experienced substantial levels of disability with impairment in key physical functions of independent living.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: back pain, disability, prospective study, vertebral fracture

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 25857
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/25857
ISSN: 0937-941X
PURE UUID: c6a8912e-e5f1-42a1-8209-31f8802cb2ed
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2006
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T.W. O'Neill
Author: W. Cockerill
Author: C. Matthis
Author: H.H. Raspe
Author: M. Lunt
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: D. Banzer
Author: J.B. Cannata
Author: M. Naves
Author: B. Felsch
Author: D. Felsenberg
Author: J. Janott
Author: O. Johnell
Author: J.A. Kanis
Author: G. Kragl
Author: A. Lopes Vaz
Author: G. Lyritis
Author: P. Masaryk
Author: G. Poor
Author: D.M. Reid
Author: W. Reisinger
Author: C. Scheidt-Nave
Author: J.J. Stepan
Author: C.J. Todd
Author: A.D. Woolf
Author: J. Reeve
Author: A.J. Silman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×