The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A performance comparison between two design techniques for non-linear output feedback control

A performance comparison between two design techniques for non-linear output feedback control
A performance comparison between two design techniques for non-linear output feedback control
For a system possessing a non-linear output feedback normal form, an observer backstepping design is compared to a high gain observer design with respect to non-singular performance cost functional. If the initial error between the initial condition of the state and the initial condition of the observer is large, the high gain observer design is shown to have better performance than the observer backstepping design. An output feedback system with parametric uncertainty is then considered. It is shown that if an a priori estimate for the bound of the uncertain parameter is conservative, then an adaptive observer backstepping design has better performance than the adaptive high gain observer design.
0020-3270
264-276
French, M
22958f0e-d779-4999-adf6-2711e2d910f8
Xie, C
7bd71d6c-a92c-438c-8bdf-e54b59208c15
French, M
22958f0e-d779-4999-adf6-2711e2d910f8
Xie, C
7bd71d6c-a92c-438c-8bdf-e54b59208c15

French, M and Xie, C (2004) A performance comparison between two design techniques for non-linear output feedback control. International Journal of Control, 77 (3), 264-276.

Record type: Article

Abstract

For a system possessing a non-linear output feedback normal form, an observer backstepping design is compared to a high gain observer design with respect to non-singular performance cost functional. If the initial error between the initial condition of the state and the initial condition of the observer is large, the high gain observer design is shown to have better performance than the observer backstepping design. An output feedback system with parametric uncertainty is then considered. It is shown that if an a priori estimate for the bound of the uncertain parameter is conservative, then an adaptive observer backstepping design has better performance than the adaptive high gain observer design.

Text
xiemcf_ijc2004.pdf - Other
Download (190kB)

More information

Published date: 2004
Organisations: Southampton Wireless Group

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 259069
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/259069
ISSN: 0020-3270
PURE UUID: e6e5b9d4-bc77-40d5-9c53-dba7ca6afb9f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2004
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 06:18

Export record

Contributors

Author: M French
Author: C Xie

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×