Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?
Harnad, Stevan (2001) Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? In, Bishop, M. and Preston, J. (eds.) Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument. , Oxford University Press.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download
![[img]](http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/text_html.png) |
HTML
Download (45Kb) |
Description/Abstract
Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Address: Oxford |
| Related URLs: | |
| Keywords: | searle, computation, cognition, functionalism, consciousness, Turing test |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Physical and Applied Science > Electronics and Computer Science > Web & Internet Science |
| Item ID: | 260240 |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Jan 2005 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Mar 2012 11:40 |
| Contributors: | Harnad, Stevan (Author) Bishop, M. (Editor) Preston, J. (Editor) |
| Date: | 2001 |
| Additional Information: | Address: Oxford |
| Status: | Published |
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
| Further Information: | Google Scholar |
| URI: | http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/260240 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? (deposited 21 Jun 2001)
- Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? (deposited 07 Jan 2005) [Currently Displayed]
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
