The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region

Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region
Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of different screening policies for the antenatal detection of Down's syndrome.
Design: Retrospective six year survey. Setting: Maternity units of eight districts.
Participants: Women who completed their pregnancies between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1999 (155 501 deliveries). Main outcome measures: Cases of Down's syndrome identified before 24 weeks' gestation.
Results: 335 cases of Down's syndrome were identified, 323 in continuing pregnancies or liveborn children. Of these, 171 were identified antenatally. Seven different screening policies were used, in three principal groups: serum screening offered to all mothers, maternal age with serum screening or nuchal translucency available to limited groups, and maternal age combined with anomaly scans. The districts that used serum screening detected 57%, those using maternal age plus serum or nuchal translucency screening 52%, and those using a maternal age of 35 and anomaly scans detected 54%. The least successful district, which offered amniocentesis only to women aged over 37 years, detected only 31%. If amniocentesis had been offered from 35 years, as in all other districts, the detection rate would have risen to 54%. Across the region 15% (range 12-20%) of pregnant women were 35 years or more at delivery, and 58% (33-69%) of infants with Down's syndrome were born to women in this age range.
Conclusions: Current additional serum or nuchal translucency screening techniques for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome are less advantageous than previously supposed. More pregnant women were aged over 35 than has been presumed in statistical models used in demonstration projects of serum screening and, as a result, the proportion of affected fetuses in this age group is much greater than predicted.
age factors, design, standards, adult, delivery, methods, organization & administration, hospitals, maternal age, district, medical audit, fetal diseases, female, genetics, ultrasonography, syndrome
0959-8138
15-17
Wellesley, Diana
17cbd6c1-0efb-4df1-ae05-64a44987c9c0
Boyle, Tracy
ffd2683e-7470-45b4-b0e5-1fa4a5b2b04d
Barber, John
4785a6e4-bd63-4230-ab61-41a0ae12c761
Howe, David T.
2aff7e22-c75f-4d98-b8af-fe3e1a3d2dcb
Wellesley, Diana
17cbd6c1-0efb-4df1-ae05-64a44987c9c0
Boyle, Tracy
ffd2683e-7470-45b4-b0e5-1fa4a5b2b04d
Barber, John
4785a6e4-bd63-4230-ab61-41a0ae12c761
Howe, David T.
2aff7e22-c75f-4d98-b8af-fe3e1a3d2dcb

Wellesley, Diana, Boyle, Tracy, Barber, John and Howe, David T. (2002) Retrospective audit of different antenatal screening policies for Down's syndrome in eight district general hospitals in one health region. BMJ, 325 (7354), 15-17. (doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7354.15).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of different screening policies for the antenatal detection of Down's syndrome.
Design: Retrospective six year survey. Setting: Maternity units of eight districts.
Participants: Women who completed their pregnancies between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1999 (155 501 deliveries). Main outcome measures: Cases of Down's syndrome identified before 24 weeks' gestation.
Results: 335 cases of Down's syndrome were identified, 323 in continuing pregnancies or liveborn children. Of these, 171 were identified antenatally. Seven different screening policies were used, in three principal groups: serum screening offered to all mothers, maternal age with serum screening or nuchal translucency available to limited groups, and maternal age combined with anomaly scans. The districts that used serum screening detected 57%, those using maternal age plus serum or nuchal translucency screening 52%, and those using a maternal age of 35 and anomaly scans detected 54%. The least successful district, which offered amniocentesis only to women aged over 37 years, detected only 31%. If amniocentesis had been offered from 35 years, as in all other districts, the detection rate would have risen to 54%. Across the region 15% (range 12-20%) of pregnant women were 35 years or more at delivery, and 58% (33-69%) of infants with Down's syndrome were born to women in this age range.
Conclusions: Current additional serum or nuchal translucency screening techniques for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome are less advantageous than previously supposed. More pregnant women were aged over 35 than has been presumed in statistical models used in demonstration projects of serum screening and, as a result, the proportion of affected fetuses in this age group is much greater than predicted.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002
Keywords: age factors, design, standards, adult, delivery, methods, organization & administration, hospitals, maternal age, district, medical audit, fetal diseases, female, genetics, ultrasonography, syndrome

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26120
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26120
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: e30495f7-d85a-41b1-bbc6-f2073676505c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Diana Wellesley
Author: Tracy Boyle
Author: John Barber
Author: David T. Howe

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×