The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Determination of human ventricular repolarization by noncontact mapping: validation with monophasic action potential recordings

Determination of human ventricular repolarization by noncontact mapping: validation with monophasic action potential recordings
Determination of human ventricular repolarization by noncontact mapping: validation with monophasic action potential recordings
Background: Noncontact mapping (NCM) has not been validated as a clinical technique to measure ventricular repolarization. We used NCM to determine repolarization characteristics by analysis of reconstructed unipolar electrograms (UEs) at the same sites as monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings in the human ventricle.
Methods and Results: MAPs were recorded from a total of 355 beats at 46 sites in the left or right ventricle of 9 patients undergoing ablation of ventricular tachycardia guided by NCM (EnSite system). Measurements were made during sinus rhythm, constant right ventricular pacing, and ventricular extrastimuli during restitution-curve construction. The EnGuide locator signal was used to document MAP catheter locations on the endocardial geometry. UE-determined activation-recovery interval (ARI) measured at the maximum derivative of the T wave (Wyatt method) and the minimum derivative of the positive T wave (alternative method) was correlated with MAP measured at 90% repolarization (MAP90%) at the same sites. ARI correlated with MAP90% during steady state by the Wyatt method (r=0.83, P<0.001) and the alternative method (r=0.94, P<0.001). Restitution curves constructed from MAP and UE data exhibited the same characteristics, with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.95 (range, 0.90 to 0.99, P<0.001). The error between ARI and MAP90% was greater over a shorter diastolic coupling interval but was not influenced by distance of the sampling site from the multielectrode array.
Conclusions: NCM accurately determines steady-state and dynamic endocardial repolarization in humans. Global, high-density, NCM data could be used to characterize abnormalities of human ventricular repolarization.
electrophysiology, mapping, ventricles, potentials
0009-7322
1343-1350
Yue, Arthur M.
4040f8ec-0252-49e0-b838-58f37956acd2
Paisey, John R.
4d958db6-f32d-4ce7-bef5-003a4a358312
Robinson, Steve
8d1b6865-6f65-464a-a0e0-1262e09cb989
Betts, Tim R.
deac7746-b99a-4316-a312-16a3e43ab0ec
Roberts, Paul R.
193431e8-f9d5-48d6-8f62-ed9052b2571d
Morgan, John M.
ac98099e-241d-4551-bc98-709f6dfc8680
Yue, Arthur M.
4040f8ec-0252-49e0-b838-58f37956acd2
Paisey, John R.
4d958db6-f32d-4ce7-bef5-003a4a358312
Robinson, Steve
8d1b6865-6f65-464a-a0e0-1262e09cb989
Betts, Tim R.
deac7746-b99a-4316-a312-16a3e43ab0ec
Roberts, Paul R.
193431e8-f9d5-48d6-8f62-ed9052b2571d
Morgan, John M.
ac98099e-241d-4551-bc98-709f6dfc8680

Yue, Arthur M., Paisey, John R., Robinson, Steve, Betts, Tim R., Roberts, Paul R. and Morgan, John M. (2004) Determination of human ventricular repolarization by noncontact mapping: validation with monophasic action potential recordings. Circulation, 110 (11), 1343-1350. (doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000141734.43393.BE).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Noncontact mapping (NCM) has not been validated as a clinical technique to measure ventricular repolarization. We used NCM to determine repolarization characteristics by analysis of reconstructed unipolar electrograms (UEs) at the same sites as monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings in the human ventricle.
Methods and Results: MAPs were recorded from a total of 355 beats at 46 sites in the left or right ventricle of 9 patients undergoing ablation of ventricular tachycardia guided by NCM (EnSite system). Measurements were made during sinus rhythm, constant right ventricular pacing, and ventricular extrastimuli during restitution-curve construction. The EnGuide locator signal was used to document MAP catheter locations on the endocardial geometry. UE-determined activation-recovery interval (ARI) measured at the maximum derivative of the T wave (Wyatt method) and the minimum derivative of the positive T wave (alternative method) was correlated with MAP measured at 90% repolarization (MAP90%) at the same sites. ARI correlated with MAP90% during steady state by the Wyatt method (r=0.83, P<0.001) and the alternative method (r=0.94, P<0.001). Restitution curves constructed from MAP and UE data exhibited the same characteristics, with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.95 (range, 0.90 to 0.99, P<0.001). The error between ARI and MAP90% was greater over a shorter diastolic coupling interval but was not influenced by distance of the sampling site from the multielectrode array.
Conclusions: NCM accurately determines steady-state and dynamic endocardial repolarization in humans. Global, high-density, NCM data could be used to characterize abnormalities of human ventricular repolarization.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: electrophysiology, mapping, ventricles, potentials

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26150
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26150
ISSN: 0009-7322
PURE UUID: e87b8648-4cab-4f0b-b8ae-9d516097de80

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Arthur M. Yue
Author: John R. Paisey
Author: Steve Robinson
Author: Tim R. Betts
Author: Paul R. Roberts
Author: John M. Morgan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×