Why and how the problem of the evolution of Universal Grammar (UG) is hard


Harnad, Stevan (2008) Why and how the problem of the evolution of Universal Grammar (UG) is hard. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, (5), 524-526. (doi:10.1017/S0140525X08005153).

Download

[img] HTML (Long version) - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.

Download (30Kb)
[img] Other (Long version (RTF)) - Author's Original
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives.

Download (33Kb)
[img] HTML (Published version (shorter)) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (22Kb)

Description/Abstract

Universal Grammar (UG) is a complicated set of grammatical rules that underlies our grammatical capacity. We all follow the rules of UG, but we were never taught them, and we could not have learned them from trial and error experience either (not enough data, or time). So UG must be inborn. But for similar reasons, it seems implausible that UG was “learned” by trial and error evolution either: What was the variation and competition? And what were UG’s adaptive advantages? So this leaves the hard problem of explaining where our brain’s UG capacity came from. Christiansen & Chater (C&C) suggest an answer: Language is an organism, like us, and our brains were not selected for UG capacity; rather, languages were selected for learnability with minimal trial and error experience by our brains. This explanation is circular: Where did our brains’ selective capacity to learn all and only UG-compliant languages come from? Chomsky suggests it might be a combination of optimality and logical necessity.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1017/S0140525X08005153
Additional Information: This includes both the full, longer version and the shorter published version Commentary On: Christiansen, Morten H. and Chater, Nick (2008) "Language as Shaped by the Brain" Behavioral and Brain Sciences (forthcoming)
ISSNs: 0140-525X (print)
1469-1825 (electronic)
Keywords: language, evolution, poverty of the stimulus, evolution, universal grammar, chomsky
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering > Electronics and Computer Science > Web & Internet Science
ePrint ID: 265618
Date :
Date Event
October 2008Published
Date Deposited: 27 Apr 2008 16:42
Last Modified: 31 Mar 2016 14:11
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265618

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics