The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Background: It has been suggested that primary care should become more involved in providing genetic services, such as basic risk assessment, to enable patients with a moderate/high risk to be referred and those with a low risk to receive reassurance and advice from their general practitioner (GP). However, GPs currently lack knowledge and confidence in this area.
Aim: To investigate the effect of an in-practice educational session and information pack on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases.
Design of study: Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Setting: GP principals in 170 practices in Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire. Of the 688 GPs, 426 (62%) participated.
Method: Practices were randomised either to Group A (receiving an inpractice educational session plus information pack), Group B (receiving an information pack alone), or Group C (receiving neither an educational session nor a pack). The main study outcome was the proportion of GPs making the correct referral decision on at least five out of six family history vignettes. A secondary outcome was GPs' reported confidence in managing patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, measured by a score that was generated by combining responses to four questions.
Results: There was a 40% (95% CI = 30-50%, P <0.001) improvement in the proportion of GPs who made the correct referral decision on at least five out of the six vignettes in Group A (111/140 [79%]) compared with Group C (controls) (63/162 [39%]), and a 42% (95% CI = 31-52%, P <0.001) improvement in Group B (100/124 [81%]) compared with the control group. There was a trend in reported confidence in the management of individuals with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer from a mean confidence score of 2.3 in Group A to 2.0 in Group B and 1.5 in Group C (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Providing GPs with an information pack significantly improved referral decisions regarding patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer. Although extremely well received, an in-house educational session produced no additional improvements. There were, however, greater levels of reported confidence in the group who received the educational session in addition to the information pack.
genetic counselling, risk assessment, patient management, referral
0960-1643
817-821
Watson, E.
b478d08d-9f24-4572-a223-a85c1f26bcf0
Clements, A.
67f9bcef-1688-4c5f-8b87-0da07a119184
Yudkin, P.
a95b9ab0-1949-47d6-8799-b1f8bc2c4794
Rose, P.
3332de21-7eaf-44e3-b021-69c7e30760d6
Bukach, C.
959d7c00-5dcd-4b5c-b3e9-09a29c95858a
Mackay, J.
8a2363bb-013c-415a-ba9b-77aee80d1002
Lucassen, A.
ff9a15b3-3c3a-4538-bc8e-b0099b8b382d
Austoker, J.
a62aa7ed-43bc-46e2-bd7c-daa5fe790905
Watson, E.
b478d08d-9f24-4572-a223-a85c1f26bcf0
Clements, A.
67f9bcef-1688-4c5f-8b87-0da07a119184
Yudkin, P.
a95b9ab0-1949-47d6-8799-b1f8bc2c4794
Rose, P.
3332de21-7eaf-44e3-b021-69c7e30760d6
Bukach, C.
959d7c00-5dcd-4b5c-b3e9-09a29c95858a
Mackay, J.
8a2363bb-013c-415a-ba9b-77aee80d1002
Lucassen, A.
ff9a15b3-3c3a-4538-bc8e-b0099b8b382d
Austoker, J.
a62aa7ed-43bc-46e2-bd7c-daa5fe790905

Watson, E., Clements, A., Yudkin, P., Rose, P., Bukach, C., Mackay, J., Lucassen, A. and Austoker, J. (2001) Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice, 51 (471), 817-821.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that primary care should become more involved in providing genetic services, such as basic risk assessment, to enable patients with a moderate/high risk to be referred and those with a low risk to receive reassurance and advice from their general practitioner (GP). However, GPs currently lack knowledge and confidence in this area.
Aim: To investigate the effect of an in-practice educational session and information pack on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases.
Design of study: Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Setting: GP principals in 170 practices in Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire. Of the 688 GPs, 426 (62%) participated.
Method: Practices were randomised either to Group A (receiving an inpractice educational session plus information pack), Group B (receiving an information pack alone), or Group C (receiving neither an educational session nor a pack). The main study outcome was the proportion of GPs making the correct referral decision on at least five out of six family history vignettes. A secondary outcome was GPs' reported confidence in managing patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, measured by a score that was generated by combining responses to four questions.
Results: There was a 40% (95% CI = 30-50%, P <0.001) improvement in the proportion of GPs who made the correct referral decision on at least five out of the six vignettes in Group A (111/140 [79%]) compared with Group C (controls) (63/162 [39%]), and a 42% (95% CI = 31-52%, P <0.001) improvement in Group B (100/124 [81%]) compared with the control group. There was a trend in reported confidence in the management of individuals with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer from a mean confidence score of 2.3 in Group A to 2.0 in Group B and 1.5 in Group C (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Providing GPs with an information pack significantly improved referral decisions regarding patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer. Although extremely well received, an in-house educational session produced no additional improvements. There were, however, greater levels of reported confidence in the group who received the educational session in addition to the information pack.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: genetic counselling, risk assessment, patient management, referral

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26655
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26655
ISSN: 0960-1643
PURE UUID: dab25f9c-f483-47bf-85d7-a6e23db4a9dc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Apr 2006
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 20:36

Export record

Contributors

Author: E. Watson
Author: A. Clements
Author: P. Yudkin
Author: P. Rose
Author: C. Bukach
Author: J. Mackay
Author: A. Lucassen
Author: J. Austoker

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×