A comparison of planar scintigraphy and SPECT measurement of total lung deposition of inhaled aerosol

Fleming, J.S., Conway, J.H., Bolt, L. and Holgate, S.T. (2003) A comparison of planar scintigraphy and SPECT measurement of total lung deposition of inhaled aerosol. Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 16 (1), 9-19. (doi:10.1089/089426803764928310).

Abstract

Planar gamma camera imaging of inhaled aerosol deposition is extensively used to assess the total deposition in the lung. However, validation of the measurements is not straightforward, as gold standard measurements of lung activity against which to compare are not readily available. Quantitative SPECT imaging provides an alternative method for comparison. Four different methods for planar image quantification are compared. Two attenuation correction techniques, thickness measurement and transmission measurement, have been combined with two scatter correction techniques, reduced attenuation coefficient and line-source scatter function convolution subtraction. Each technique has been applied to 10 studies of aerosol deposition of a fine aerosol (mass median aerodynamic diameter 1.8 ?m) and 10 studies using a coarse aerosol (mass median aerodynamic diameter 6.5 ?m). The total activity in the right lung for each measurement has been compared to the value determined from SPECT imaging on the same subjects. When the thickness measurement and transmission techniques were applied with scatter compensation using a reduced attenuation coefficient, activity was systematically overestimated by 5% in both cases. The corresponding random errors (coefficient of variation) were 8.6% and 6.6%. Separate scatter correction reduced these systemic errors significantly to -1.5% and 2.7%, respectively. The random errors were not affected. All techniques provided assessment of total lung activity with an accuracy and precision that differed by less than 10% compared to the SPECT values. Planar gamma camera imaging provides a good method of assessing total lung deposition of inhaled aerosol. This paper was cited by:

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: J.H. Conway

Download statistics