The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Presentation of allergen in different food preparations affects the nature of the allergic reaction - a case series

Presentation of allergen in different food preparations affects the nature of the allergic reaction - a case series
Presentation of allergen in different food preparations affects the nature of the allergic reaction - a case series
Background Characterization of fatal and non-fatal reactions to food indicates that the majority of reactions are due to the ingestion of prepared foods rather than the non-processed allergen. In an ongoing study that used a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge to investigate peanut allergy and clinical symptoms, the observed reaction severity in four of the first six subjects was greater than anticipated. We hypothesized that this was due to differences in the composition of the challenge vehicle.
Objective The aim was to investigate whether the severity of observed challenge reactions would be repeated on re-challenge with a lower fat challenge vehicle.
Methods Peanut-allergic subjects were re-challenged with a lower fat recipe after reacting more severely than was anticipated to an initial peanut challenge. Similar challenge vehicle recipes were used, the only difference being the lower fat content (22.9% compared with 31.5%). The peanut content of the two recipes was analysed using RAST inhibition studies and ELISA tests.
Results Three of four subjects reacted to much smaller doses of peanut protein on re-challenge (mean dose equivalence – 23 times less peanut) with the lower fat recipe. RAST inhibition showed that neither recipe altered epitope recognition. The higher fat recipe required twice as much peanut to cause 50% inhibition. ELISA detected far lower levels of peanut in the higher fat recipe (220 000 parts per million (p.p.m.)) than in the lower fat recipe (990 000 p.p.m.).
Conclusion The fat content of a challenge vehicle has a profound effect on the reaction experienced after allergen ingestion. This is another factor to be considered in assessing the risk of certain foods to food-allergic consumers and adds another dimension to clinical, research and regulatory practice.
0954-7894
1581-1585
Grimshaw, K.E.C.
766b6cf0-347a-447d-aeab-f07366f8ce28
King, R.M.
aad14b24-ad90-4efc-a91c-91ce27ab6c8a
Nordlee, J.A.
5557d27e-e700-4e43-913a-6f7141495e0d
Hefle, S.L.
ec2094b4-5875-46c2-be40-d67bac2d1f05
Warner, J.O.
c232f1e5-62eb-46e6-8b0c-4836b45b36a5
Hourihane, J.O.B.
ece65177-9267-4011-84bd-fb8554ba892f
Grimshaw, K.E.C.
766b6cf0-347a-447d-aeab-f07366f8ce28
King, R.M.
aad14b24-ad90-4efc-a91c-91ce27ab6c8a
Nordlee, J.A.
5557d27e-e700-4e43-913a-6f7141495e0d
Hefle, S.L.
ec2094b4-5875-46c2-be40-d67bac2d1f05
Warner, J.O.
c232f1e5-62eb-46e6-8b0c-4836b45b36a5
Hourihane, J.O.B.
ece65177-9267-4011-84bd-fb8554ba892f

Grimshaw, K.E.C., King, R.M., Nordlee, J.A., Hefle, S.L., Warner, J.O. and Hourihane, J.O.B. (2003) Presentation of allergen in different food preparations affects the nature of the allergic reaction - a case series. Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 33 (11), 1581-1585. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01795.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background Characterization of fatal and non-fatal reactions to food indicates that the majority of reactions are due to the ingestion of prepared foods rather than the non-processed allergen. In an ongoing study that used a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge to investigate peanut allergy and clinical symptoms, the observed reaction severity in four of the first six subjects was greater than anticipated. We hypothesized that this was due to differences in the composition of the challenge vehicle.
Objective The aim was to investigate whether the severity of observed challenge reactions would be repeated on re-challenge with a lower fat challenge vehicle.
Methods Peanut-allergic subjects were re-challenged with a lower fat recipe after reacting more severely than was anticipated to an initial peanut challenge. Similar challenge vehicle recipes were used, the only difference being the lower fat content (22.9% compared with 31.5%). The peanut content of the two recipes was analysed using RAST inhibition studies and ELISA tests.
Results Three of four subjects reacted to much smaller doses of peanut protein on re-challenge (mean dose equivalence – 23 times less peanut) with the lower fat recipe. RAST inhibition showed that neither recipe altered epitope recognition. The higher fat recipe required twice as much peanut to cause 50% inhibition. ELISA detected far lower levels of peanut in the higher fat recipe (220 000 parts per million (p.p.m.)) than in the lower fat recipe (990 000 p.p.m.).
Conclusion The fat content of a challenge vehicle has a profound effect on the reaction experienced after allergen ingestion. This is another factor to be considered in assessing the risk of certain foods to food-allergic consumers and adds another dimension to clinical, research and regulatory practice.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 27077
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27077
ISSN: 0954-7894
PURE UUID: 61136b8b-331e-4580-8653-4dd34c28817b

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: K.E.C. Grimshaw
Author: R.M. King
Author: J.A. Nordlee
Author: S.L. Hefle
Author: J.O. Warner
Author: J.O.B. Hourihane

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×