From Manifesta to Krypta: The Relevance of Categories for Trusting Others


Falcone, Rino, Piunti, Michele, Venanzi, Matteo and Castelfranchi, Cristiano (2011) From Manifesta to Krypta: The Relevance of Categories for Trusting Others. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology., 4, (2), 1-24. (doi:10.1145/2438653.2438662).

Download

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Download (996Kb)

Description/Abstract

In this paper we consider the special abilities needed by agents for assessing trust based on inference and reasoning. We analyze the case in which it is possible to infer trust towards unknown counterparts by reasoning on abstract classes or categories of agents shaped in a concrete application domain. We present a scenario of interacting agents providing a computational model implementing different strategies to assess trust. Assuming a medical domain, categories, including both competencies and dispositions of possible trustees, are exploited to infer trust towards possibly unknown counterparts. The proposed approach for the cognitive assessment of trust relies on agents' abilities to analyze heterogeneous information sources along different dimensions. Trust is inferred based on specifc observable properties (Manifesta), namely explicitly readable signals indicating internal features (Krypta) regulating agents' behavior and effectiveness on specifc tasks. Simulative experiments evaluate the performance of trusting agents adopting different strategies to delegate tasks to possibly unknown trustees, while experimental results show the relevance of this kind of cognitive ability in the case of open Multi Agent Systems.

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 2157-6904
Divisions: Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering > Electronics and Computer Science > Agents, Interactions & Complexity
ePrint ID: 272206
Date Deposited: 16 Apr 2011 12:31
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2014 20:17
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/272206

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item