The causal topography of cognition


Harnad, Stevan (2012) The causal topography of cognition. [in special issue: A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition] Journal of Cognitive Science, 13, (2), 181-196.

Download

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Download (158Kb)
[img] Microsoft Word - Accepted Version
Download (154Kb)
[img] PDF - Publishers print
Restricted to internal admin

Download (363Kb) | Request a copy
Original Publication URL: http://j-cs.org/issues/__vol013i2/4.html

Description/Abstract

The causal structure of cognition can be simulated but not implemented computationally, just as the causal structure of a furnace can be simulated but not implemented computationally. Heating is a dynamical property, not a computational one. A computational simulation of a furnace cannot heat a real house (only a simulated house). It lacks the essential causal property of a furnace. This is obvious with computational furnaces. The only thing that allows us even to imagine that it is otherwise in the case of computational cognition is the fact that cognizing, unlike heating, is invisible (to eveyrone except the cognizer). Chalmers’s “Dancing Qualia” Argument is hence invalid: Even if there could be a computational model of cognition that was behaviorally indistinguishable from a real, feeling cognizer, it would still be true that if, like heat, feeling is a dynamical property of the brain, a flip-flop from the presence to the absence of feeling would be undetectable anywhere along Chalmers’s hypothetical component-swapping continuum from a human cognizer to a computational cognizer -- undetectable to everyone except the cognizer. But that would only be because the cognizer was locked into being incapable of doing anything to settle the matter simply because of Chalmers’s premise of input/output indistinguishability. That is not a demonstration that cognition is computation; it is just the demonstation that you get out of a premise what you put into it. But even if the causal topography of feeling, hence of cognizing, is dynamic rather than just computational, the problem of explaining the causal role played by feeling itself – how and why we feel – in the generation of our behavioral capacity – how and why we can do what we can do – will remain a “hard” (and perhaps insoluble) problem.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Commentary on: Chalmers, David (2012) A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition. Journal of Cognitive Science http://consc.net/papers/computation.html
ISSNs: 2158-9216 (print)
Related URLs:
Keywords: chalmers, causation, cognition, computation, computationalism, consciousness, dynamics, dancing qualia, feeling, functionalism, hard problem, mind/body problem, symbol grounding, turing
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Divisions: Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering > Electronics and Computer Science > Web & Internet Science
ePrint ID: 273232
Date Deposited: 24 Feb 2012 20:27
Last Modified: 14 Apr 2014 11:37
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/273232

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics