The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Smart panel with multiple decentralised units for the control of sound transmission. Part II: design of the decentralised control units

Smart panel with multiple decentralised units for the control of sound transmission. Part II: design of the decentralised control units
Smart panel with multiple decentralised units for the control of sound transmission. Part II: design of the decentralised control units
This is the second of three companion papers that summarize the theoretical and experimental work carried out to develop a prototype smart panel with 16 decentralized vibration control units for the reduction of sound radiation/transmission. In this paper the design and implementation of the 16 decentralized control units is discussed. Each control unit consists of a collocated accelerometer sensor and piezoceramic patch actuator with a single channel velocity feedback controller in order to generate active damping.
The design and implementation of a single control unit has been discussed first. The frequency response function of the sensor–actuator pair has been measured and compared with the results of a computer simulation in order to investigate the effects of accelerometer dynamics, and actuator size. Since the system is only conditionally stable, a phase lag compensator has then been designed so that larger control gains that guarantee stability could be implemented.
The single-channel controller has then been implemented on each of the 16 decentralized control loops in the final system. The stability of the final control system has been assessed by plotting the 16 eigenvalues loci matrix product between the open loop sensors–actuators frequency response matrix and the diagonal matrix of control functions (fixed control gains multiplied by the phase lag compensators). None of the loci encircle the Nyquist point (?1,0) as the frequencies varies from ?? to +? at moderate gains, although part of the locus occupies the left hand side of the plot. Thus the complete control system is stable only for a limited range of control gains.
The control effectiveness of both the single control unit and 16 decentralized control units has been assessed by plotting the velocity at one error sensor with reference to either an acoustic source in the cavity (loudspeaker) or a primary point force on the panel (shaker).
0022-460X
193-213
Gardonio, P.
bae5bf72-ea81-43a6-a756-d7153d2de77a
Bianchi, E.
2a461179-2967-453c-a0a8-0846f1c65741
Elliott, S.J.
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Gardonio, P.
bae5bf72-ea81-43a6-a756-d7153d2de77a
Bianchi, E.
2a461179-2967-453c-a0a8-0846f1c65741
Elliott, S.J.
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567

Gardonio, P., Bianchi, E. and Elliott, S.J. (2004) Smart panel with multiple decentralised units for the control of sound transmission. Part II: design of the decentralised control units. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 274 (1-2), 193-213. (doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2003.05.007).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This is the second of three companion papers that summarize the theoretical and experimental work carried out to develop a prototype smart panel with 16 decentralized vibration control units for the reduction of sound radiation/transmission. In this paper the design and implementation of the 16 decentralized control units is discussed. Each control unit consists of a collocated accelerometer sensor and piezoceramic patch actuator with a single channel velocity feedback controller in order to generate active damping.
The design and implementation of a single control unit has been discussed first. The frequency response function of the sensor–actuator pair has been measured and compared with the results of a computer simulation in order to investigate the effects of accelerometer dynamics, and actuator size. Since the system is only conditionally stable, a phase lag compensator has then been designed so that larger control gains that guarantee stability could be implemented.
The single-channel controller has then been implemented on each of the 16 decentralized control loops in the final system. The stability of the final control system has been assessed by plotting the 16 eigenvalues loci matrix product between the open loop sensors–actuators frequency response matrix and the diagonal matrix of control functions (fixed control gains multiplied by the phase lag compensators). None of the loci encircle the Nyquist point (?1,0) as the frequencies varies from ?? to +? at moderate gains, although part of the locus occupies the left hand side of the plot. Thus the complete control system is stable only for a limited range of control gains.
The control effectiveness of both the single control unit and 16 decentralized control units has been assessed by plotting the velocity at one error sensor with reference to either an acoustic source in the cavity (loudspeaker) or a primary point force on the panel (shaker).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 28477
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/28477
ISSN: 0022-460X
PURE UUID: 02b9c855-8d4f-4fb4-85f0-fe39a4702666

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P. Gardonio
Author: E. Bianchi
Author: S.J. Elliott

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×