The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pressure ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students

Pressure ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students
Pressure ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students
Aims and objectives:?To detect problems when classifying pressure ulcers and to examine whether an e-learning program is able to increase the classification skills of qualified nurses and nursing students.

Background:?Both the distinction between pressure ulcer grades and the differentiation between moisture lesions is difficult. Misclassification and incorrect identification of the lesions results in inadequate preventive and therapeutic measures. Education and training are important for spreading evidence-based insights about this topic.

Design:?Repeated measure design, consisting of one pretest and three posttests.

Methods:?The experimental intervention consisted of a one-hour session during which the participants independently went over an e-learning program. The control intervention consisted of a one-hour lecture. Both interventions had the same learning contents. A convenience sample of 212 qualified nurses and 214 final-year nursing students was randomly assigned to an experimental-and a control group.

Results:?In the pretest, the classification skills were low. After the intervention, these skills improved significantly in both groups. The nursing students achieved better results when using the e-learning program. Among the qualified nurses, there was no difference between the learning methods. Although the classification skills decreased in the posttests, they did not drop under the level of the pretest.

Conclusion:?The actual classification system does not provide the necessary information about the severity of a pressure ulcer. The differential diagnosis between a moisture lesion was complicated. The classification skills of the qualified nurses and nursing students increased by both learning methods. Repetition remains, however, necessary.

Relevance to clinical practice:?Both instruction methods are adequate to acquire the knowledge about the differences between moisture lesions and pressure ulcers. E-learning allows studying in one's own time and place, and could therefore be very suitable for repetition of the training. How to organise this training could be a subject for further research.
classification, education, nurses, nursing, pressure ulcer, students
0962-1067
1697-1707
Beeckman, D.
b511e754-d654-4151-b3cb-65e92965207d
Schoonhoven, L.
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Boucque, H.
46aa2337-7c1e-4046-8a81-382bc9e62a9e
Van Maele, G.
d6183348-3f77-4f2d-b307-9e401a2f2612
Defloor, T.
4ca437de-5cb1-4d24-91d7-a388ee5839f2
Beeckman, D.
b511e754-d654-4151-b3cb-65e92965207d
Schoonhoven, L.
46a2705b-c657-409b-b9da-329d5b1b02de
Boucque, H.
46aa2337-7c1e-4046-8a81-382bc9e62a9e
Van Maele, G.
d6183348-3f77-4f2d-b307-9e401a2f2612
Defloor, T.
4ca437de-5cb1-4d24-91d7-a388ee5839f2

Beeckman, D., Schoonhoven, L., Boucque, H., Van Maele, G. and Defloor, T. (2008) Pressure ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17 (13), 1697-1707. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02200.x). (PMID:18592624)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aims and objectives:?To detect problems when classifying pressure ulcers and to examine whether an e-learning program is able to increase the classification skills of qualified nurses and nursing students.

Background:?Both the distinction between pressure ulcer grades and the differentiation between moisture lesions is difficult. Misclassification and incorrect identification of the lesions results in inadequate preventive and therapeutic measures. Education and training are important for spreading evidence-based insights about this topic.

Design:?Repeated measure design, consisting of one pretest and three posttests.

Methods:?The experimental intervention consisted of a one-hour session during which the participants independently went over an e-learning program. The control intervention consisted of a one-hour lecture. Both interventions had the same learning contents. A convenience sample of 212 qualified nurses and 214 final-year nursing students was randomly assigned to an experimental-and a control group.

Results:?In the pretest, the classification skills were low. After the intervention, these skills improved significantly in both groups. The nursing students achieved better results when using the e-learning program. Among the qualified nurses, there was no difference between the learning methods. Although the classification skills decreased in the posttests, they did not drop under the level of the pretest.

Conclusion:?The actual classification system does not provide the necessary information about the severity of a pressure ulcer. The differential diagnosis between a moisture lesion was complicated. The classification skills of the qualified nurses and nursing students increased by both learning methods. Repetition remains, however, necessary.

Relevance to clinical practice:?Both instruction methods are adequate to acquire the knowledge about the differences between moisture lesions and pressure ulcers. E-learning allows studying in one's own time and place, and could therefore be very suitable for repetition of the training. How to organise this training could be a subject for further research.

Text
Beeckman_et_al_PU_e_learning.pdf - Other
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 12 May 2008
Published date: July 2008
Keywords: classification, education, nurses, nursing, pressure ulcer, students
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 339237
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/339237
ISSN: 0962-1067
PURE UUID: 3a0d31ff-d7cc-4bac-8891-e9406e9c6488
ORCID for L. Schoonhoven: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 May 2012 11:14
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D. Beeckman
Author: L. Schoonhoven ORCID iD
Author: H. Boucque
Author: G. Van Maele
Author: T. Defloor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×