XI: equality, personal resposibility and gender, socialisation
Mason, Andrew (2000) XI: equality, personal resposibility and gender, socialisation. Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society, 100, (3), 227. (doi:10.1111/1467-9264.00078).
Full text not available from this repository.
A number of egalitarians have reached the conclusion that inequalities are just provided that they are the outcome of holding people appropriately responsible for their choices, and that only inequalities which can be traced back to the circumstances in which people happen to find themselves are objectionable. But this form of egalitarianism needs to be supplemented with an account of when it is appropriate to hold people responsible for their choices that is properly sensitive to the profound effects of socialisation. Two of the most promising attempts to develop such an account—those of Ronald Dworkin and John Roemer—are found to be problematic in the light of a range of cases where gender socialisation influences values and aspirations
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||doi:10.1111/1467-9264.00078|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
J Political Science > JC Political theory
|Divisions :||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Social Sciences > Politics and International Relations
|Accepted Date and Publication Date:||
|Date Deposited:||25 Jul 2006|
|Last Modified:||31 Mar 2016 12:00|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)