The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Doing Coupledom: imagining, managing and performing relationality in contemporary wedding and civil partnership rituals

Doing Coupledom: imagining, managing and performing relationality in contemporary wedding and civil partnership rituals
Doing Coupledom: imagining, managing and performing relationality in contemporary wedding and civil partnership rituals
This thesis investigates how relationality is imagined, managed and performed by twenty-seven UK-based couples during their wedding and civil partnership rituals. The methodology involves a case study approach with eleven of the couples, who were followed through the planning of their ritual, retrospective interviews with sixteen couples and a photograph project with eight of these couples. Diversity in the sample in terms of age, gender and class allows these factors to be explored along with differences of sexuality between the couples.

Commitment rituals put relationality into sharp focus as they demand practices of inclusion and exclusion. Each chapter of analysis (The Decision to Marry, Wedding Work and The Big Day) highlights how tradition and relationality are particularly significant to an understanding of the fateful moments that commitment rituals represent. The perceived expectations of family members and friends are implicated in the performance of traditional symbols, while these symbols also provide a recognised form for these relationships to take. The Discussion chapter builds upon these ideas in drawing the key themes, of imagining, managing and performing that run through each chapter, together in outlining a typology of strategies. This typology challenges a central idea of the reflexive modernisation thesis, as asserted particularly by Giddens (1991, 1992, 1994, 2002), that reflexivity involves the disembedding of individuals from their relational networks. In this way the research builds upon theorisations of relationality and embeddedness, particularly those developed by Smart (2007a) and Bottero (2010). The intersubjective nature of reflexivity is emphasised with the introduction of the terms ‘reflexive coupledom’ and ‘relational reflexivity’ alongside ‘individual reflexivity’. ‘Strategies of tradition’ is also included in the typology to emphasise how meaningconstitutive tradition continues to shape ritual action. These concepts aim to be of use in future exploration of these rituals as well as in relation to other areas of personal life.
Bruce, Katie Rose Esther
d36397e1-1a69-43da-ac8f-49a410d22beb
Bruce, Katie Rose Esther
d36397e1-1a69-43da-ac8f-49a410d22beb
McGhee, Derek
63b8ae1e-8a71-470c-b780-2f0a95631902
Pau, P.
8d40bf24-1c5e-47e9-8cb9-213f0dafa122
Carol, C.
2719ab3c-1ef3-48ee-b8cc-b04e41a52006

Bruce, Katie Rose Esther (2012) Doing Coupledom: imagining, managing and performing relationality in contemporary wedding and civil partnership rituals. University of Southampton, Sociology and Social Policy, Doctoral Thesis, 308pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis investigates how relationality is imagined, managed and performed by twenty-seven UK-based couples during their wedding and civil partnership rituals. The methodology involves a case study approach with eleven of the couples, who were followed through the planning of their ritual, retrospective interviews with sixteen couples and a photograph project with eight of these couples. Diversity in the sample in terms of age, gender and class allows these factors to be explored along with differences of sexuality between the couples.

Commitment rituals put relationality into sharp focus as they demand practices of inclusion and exclusion. Each chapter of analysis (The Decision to Marry, Wedding Work and The Big Day) highlights how tradition and relationality are particularly significant to an understanding of the fateful moments that commitment rituals represent. The perceived expectations of family members and friends are implicated in the performance of traditional symbols, while these symbols also provide a recognised form for these relationships to take. The Discussion chapter builds upon these ideas in drawing the key themes, of imagining, managing and performing that run through each chapter, together in outlining a typology of strategies. This typology challenges a central idea of the reflexive modernisation thesis, as asserted particularly by Giddens (1991, 1992, 1994, 2002), that reflexivity involves the disembedding of individuals from their relational networks. In this way the research builds upon theorisations of relationality and embeddedness, particularly those developed by Smart (2007a) and Bottero (2010). The intersubjective nature of reflexivity is emphasised with the introduction of the terms ‘reflexive coupledom’ and ‘relational reflexivity’ alongside ‘individual reflexivity’. ‘Strategies of tradition’ is also included in the typology to emphasise how meaningconstitutive tradition continues to shape ritual action. These concepts aim to be of use in future exploration of these rituals as well as in relation to other areas of personal life.

Text
KatieBruceThesis.pdf - Other
Download (5MB)

More information

Published date: May 2012
Organisations: University of Southampton, Social Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 341785
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/341785
PURE UUID: be89fcbb-c75d-4277-8f79-430c9bd854d9
ORCID for Derek McGhee: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3226-6300

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Nov 2012 14:28
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 11:45

Export record

Contributors

Author: Katie Rose Esther Bruce
Thesis advisor: Derek McGhee ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: P. Pau
Thesis advisor: C. Carol

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×