Negotiating multilateral instruments against missile proliferation
Mistry, Dinshaw and Smith, Mark (2005) Negotiating multilateral instruments against missile proliferation. International Negotiation, 10, (3), 425-451. (doi:10.1163/157180605776087480).
Full text not available from this repository.
The absence of a major multilateral treaty banning missiles is explained by the limited scope of the two main instruments against missile proliferation – the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and the Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (HCOC). In the MTCR's case, limiting the scope to supply-side technology controls facilitated progress during its negotiations. In the Hague Code, limiting the scope to transparency, and keeping out additional items such as incentives to renounce ballistic missiles and the topic of cruise missiles, made negotiations easier. The trade-off from a limited scope in both instruments is that there is still no significant worldwide treaty banning missiles.
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)|
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Social Sciences > Politics and International Relations
|Date Deposited:||16 May 2006|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2012 11:47|
|Contributors:||Mistry, Dinshaw (Author)
Smith, Mark (Author)
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)